[rpd] Eligibility Criteria for PDWG chairs

[Emem William]

Dear Jordi,

Thank you for your mail. You are an objective person but when it comes to
your proposals you get blinded. You said it's not a plot? Do you think
these things just happen without some thinking behind it. You get bomb
shell on Friday nights and it's always a coincidence. It's a coordinated
strategy designed by uncle Accra.
You see funny interpretation and think it's just a mistake?
Okay, let the mistake continue.
I'm still observing.

Bye

Cheers,
Emem William


On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, 20:26 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
wrote:


> Hi Emem,

>

>

>

> I don’t think there is a plot, however there is a clear strange

> misinterpretation of the PDP and the bylaws and this happened since long

> time ago.

>

>

>

> In my opinion the recall of the chairs was not a plot, but totally

> correct. I tried to told them in the list that the way they were

> interpreting the PDP was wrong.

>

>

>

> I believe chairs said the true regarding they request to the board to

> ratify the policies. One of the confirmed to me in private. I asked to

> resend the email in the list, but refused to continue speaking to me and

> sending this email to the list (also was told that Eddy was asked to

> clarify), for personal reasons.

>

>

>

> This is why, personally can’t longer trust the board, and I’m sincerely **very

> sad** to say this, because it is not just one mistake, but one after the

> other. I use mistakes to be “soft”, as I think they are just hiding facts,

> which is more than a mistake.

>

>

>

> Unfortunately, this is what we have and it is true that the board is

> setting policies such as the ToR, which are modifying the PDP against the

> PDP and the bylaws. So that’s why we need urgently to have chairs in place,

> even if temporarily, to resolve that and for once, make sure that the board

> doesn’t anymore do policies unless they are really urgent and then they

> must be endorsed in the next meeting.

>

>

>

> Regards,

>

> Jordi

>

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> El 26/3/21 20:10, "Emem William" <dwizard65 at gmail.com> escribió:

>

>

>

> Dear PD Working Group,

>

>

>

> Please read Inbetween the lines. I see and have been quietly observing a

> pattern here.

>

> It looks like the board chair and his friends are planning a grand plot

> here. Quite intelligently planned.

>

>

>

> Chairs Recalled: Board Chair and 3 of his friends needed to execute the

> plot . To recall PDWG chair. You need Board Chair and 3 friends. Hummm..

>

>

>

> Policy passed by the WG but Board chair and his friends didn't like it.

> They decided to say the chairs never sent the mail cos they know they can't

> pull a super majority on the board so it better killed. We all remember the

> advice from Ashok a while ago on the board prerogative policy.

>

>

>

> Ashok  and board chair?

>

>

>

> Co-Chairs informed me and us all here that they did. What going on here ?

> Even if they did not the documents are available in the public domain.

>

>

>

> Appeal Committee was next. Board Chair again. If there is an appeal that

> you want to influence. Ask one AC member to resign and suddenly no more

> quorum. Then Board Chair and his friends are replacing them all.

>

>

>

> Now Co Chair replacement: Board chair wants to appoint in conjunction with

> friends and Madhvi.

>

> I remember, I once read something on this mailing list about Madhvi..

>

> But by they way it's now

>

> Ashok, Board Chair and Madhvi(SM)...I see a pattern.

>

>

>

> We now know what to do

>

> I rest my case.

>

>

>

>  Before I go..

>

>

>

> I hope AFRINIC would recover one day.

>

> But I must empasis that it's never the prerogative of the board chair to

> appoint PDWG chair neither is it that of the board. It should never happen

> if we all are awake.

>

>

>

> The board chair and friends are trying hard to circumvent the community in

> all the process.

>

> I see a pattern..

>

>

>

> Bye for now.

>

>

>

> Regards,

> Emem William

>

>

>

> On Fri, Mar 26, 2021, 18:20 Madhvi Gokool <madhvi at afrinic.net> wrote:

>

> Dear PDWG,

>

>

>

> I submit to you the below proposed eligibility criteria which are based

> upon the previous discussions on the rpd mailing list.

>

>

>

> We encourage you to follow the following guidelines to facilitate the

> compilation of your feedback:-

>

>

>

> 1.    Please read and thoroughly review the list of eligibility

> criteria.

>

> 2.    Please  reply back to this email to keep the same thread of the

> discussion to ensure that  your feedback is read.

>

> 3.    If there are any criteria that you either support or do not

> support, please clearly refer to it  and provide concise feedback (refer to

> the numbering in the list below).

>

> 4.    If there are new criteria that you would like to propose, please

> clearly mention it concisely and  add a new numbering.

>

>

>

> *Proposed Eligibility Criteria *

>

>

>

> A.     The intended volunteer must be well conversant with AFRINIC’s

> consensus-driven ecosystem, including its Policy Development Process; A

> practical  understanding of RFC 7282 is required.

>

> B.     The intended volunteer must be accessible and make himself or

> herself available to follow and moderate all policy proposal discussions on

> AFRINIC’s rpd mailing list as well as attending AFRINIC Public Policy

> Meetings whenever they are held (Note: All logistical assistance will be

> provided by AFRINIC);

>

> C.     The intended volunteer must have at least 3 years of sufficient

> past and active participative experience on either AFRINIC’s or any other

> RIR’s rpd mailing list;

>

> D.     The Intended volunteer must have participated in at least two (2)

> AFRINIC events (face-to-face or virtual) in the past three (3) years;

>

> E.      The intended volunteer must have sufficient capability of

> understanding and interpreting the contents of AFRINIC’s Consolidated

> Policy Manual;

>

> F.      The intended volunteer must be able to demonstrate good technical

> knowledge and understanding of the Internet ecosystem. Having 3 years of

> related technical experience would be an advantage

>

> G.     Not being author of any of the policy proposals currently under

> discussion.

>

>

>

> The following are proposals not in the discussion threads :

>

> H)The intended volunteer must either reside within or originate from

> AFRINIC’s service region;

>

> I) The intended volunteer must be able to demonstrate excellent

> presentation and communication skills.

>

>

>

> We look forward to receiving your comments and feedback.

>

>

>

> ……………………………………………………………..

>

>

>

> Cher PDWG,

>

>

>

> Je vous communique les critères d'éligibilité proposés ci-dessous, qui

> sont basés sur les discussions précédentes sur la liste de diffusion rpd.

>

>

>

> Nous vous encourageons à suivre les directives suivantes afin de faciliter

> la compilation de vos commentaires :-

>

>

>

> 1.    Veuillez lire et examiner attentivement la liste des critères

> d'éligibilité.

>

> 2.    Veuillez répondre à ce courriel afin de conserver le même fil de

> discussion et de vous assurer que vos commentaires sont lus.

>

> 3.    S'il y a des critères que vous soutenez ou non, veuillez y faire

> clairement référence et fournir un retour d'information concis (veuillez

> vous référer à la numérotation dans la liste ci-dessous).

>

> 4.    S'il y a de nouveaux critères que vous souhaitez proposer, veuillez

> le mentionner clairement et de manière concise et ajouter une nouvelle

> numérotation.

>

>

>

> Critères d'éligibilité proposés

>

>

>

> A.    Le volontaire concerné doit bien connaître l'écosystème consensuel

> d'AFRINIC, y compris son processus d'élaboration des politiques. Une

> compréhension pratique du RFC 7282 est requise.

>

> B.    Le volontaire concerné doit être accessible et se rendre disponible

> pour suivre et modérer toutes les discussions sur les propositions de

> politique sur la liste de diffusion rpd d'AFRINIC, ainsi que pour assister

> aux réunions de politique publique d'AFRINIC lorsqu'elles ont lieu (Note :

> Toute l'assistance logistique sera fournie par AFRINIC) ;

>

> C.    Le volontaire concerné doit avoir au moins 3 ans d'expérience

> suffisante et active de participation à la liste de diffusion rpd de

> l'AFRINIC ou de tout autre RIR ;

>

> D.    Le volontaire concerné doit avoir participé à au moins deux (2)

> événements AFRINIC (face à face ou virtuels) au cours des trois (3)

> dernières années ;

>

> E.    Le volontaire concerné doit avoir une capacité suffisante de

> compréhension et d'interprétation du contenu du Consolidated Policy Manual

> d'AFRINIC ;

>

> F.    Le volontaire concerné doit être capable de démontrer une bonne

> connaissance technique et une bonne compréhension de l'écosystème Internet.

> Une expérience technique de 3 ans dans ce domaine serait un avantage.

>

> G.   Ne doit pas être l'auteur de l'une des propositions de politique

> actuellement en discussion.

>

>

>

> Les propositions suivantes ne figurent pas dans les fils de discussion :

>

> H.    Le volontaire concerné doit soit résider ou soit en être originaire

> de la région de service d'AFRINIC, ;

>

> I.      Le volontaire doit être capable de démontrer d'excellentes

> capacités de présentation et de communication.

>

>

>

> Nous nous attendons à recevoir vos commentaires et feedbacks.

>

> Regards

>

> Madhvi

>

> --

>

> Madhvi Gokool

>

> Senior IP Resources Specialist

>

> AFRINIC Ltd.

>

> t:  +230 403 5100 | f: +230 466 6758 |

>

> w: www.afrinic.net

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210327/b49b2efc/attachment-0001.html>