[rpd] Secretariat PDWG

[Anthony Ubah]

Hi Marriam,

Your point is clearly noted. However, if you read my line carefully, you'll
find that I have neither spoken well nor less of the character, competence,
or qualities of the immediate past co-chairs, more so the actions, or
inactions of the either. I simply upheld my choice of the 2 options put
forward by the secretariat through Madhvi, which are online election, and
consensus approach. I wish to keep it that way.

*Best Regards,*

*UBAH ANTHONY*


On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:34 PM Mirriam <mirriamlauren at yahoo.com> wrote:


> Hi Anthony,

>

> Yes my opinion on the re-called co-chairs stand because to me they were

> not that competent for the role. The reality is, one was really inactive

> and extremely passive.

>

> The opinion of the few experienced participants which is sensible can be

> wiser than the opinion of majority community full of fake subscribers which

> may be misguided or disinterested in the working group affairs.

>

> Mirriam.

>

> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>

>

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:35 PM, Anthony Ubah

> <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello Marriam,

>

> The is grossly subjective. I won't comment on your opinion about the

> former co-chairs. However I want to comment on the election process, which

> in my own opinion of the last one was a transparent and simple process,

> which left no one dissatisfied.

> Putting facts in, you cannot say an online election will always produce

> candidates below par or inexperienced as you put it. The onus is on the

> community to vote it candidates that th trust can deliver, and not the

> opinion from a few.

>

>

> Kind regards,

>

> Anthony

>

>

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 8:29 AM Mirriam <mirriamlauren at yahoo.com> wrote:

>

> Hi Anthony,

>

> Even WG consensus has been tried and tested as a great procedure in the

> past and you can ask Dewole, Sami, Seun etc.....

>

> As a WG, let us not shy away from the fact that in recent past two well

> meaning but inexperienced co-chairs who kept getting things very wrong  got

> selected by voting. Don't get me wrong, voting by ranked choice may be good

> second option.

>

> The fall back to the board also sounds as a reasonable selection process

> with involvement of WG if board can float candidates.

>

> Mirriam

>

> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>

>

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:46 AM, Anthony Ubah

> <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210226/eab90fd4/attachment.html>