Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Secretariat PDWG

Mirriam mirriamlauren at
Fri Feb 26 10:34:20 UTC 2021

Hi Gaby
I have been reading about the notion that consensus is hard and you are now claiming that its tricky etc...
I believe this claims are baseless and with no merit. 
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:55 PM, Gaby Giner<gabyginernetwork at> wrote: Hi everyone,
It's quite obvious that option 1 is the clear choice to go with as opposed to option 2. An online election provides much more clarity and expedites the process as opposed to the mess of voting by consensus. It's also been proven by the past that consensus is such a tricky thing to achieve, and could cost us time and effort. 
Option 1 is the no-brainer choice.
Thanks, Gaby
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 3:32 PM Mirriam via RPD <rpd at> wrote:

Hi Anthony,
Even WG consensus has been tried and tested as a great procedure in the past and you can ask Dewole, Sami, Seun etc.....
As a WG, let us not shy away from the fact that in recent past two well meaning but inexperienced co-chairs who kept getting things very wrong  got selected by voting. Don't get me wrong, voting by ranked choice may be good second option.
The fall back to the board also sounds as a reasonable selection process with involvement of WG if board can float candidates.
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:46 AM, Anthony Ubah<ubah.tonyiyke at> wrote: _______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at

RPD mailing list
RPD at

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list