[rpd] Secretariat PDWG

[Gaby Giner]

Hi everyone,

It's quite obvious that option 1 is the clear choice to go with as opposed
to option 2. An online election provides much more clarity and expedites
the process as opposed to the mess of voting by consensus. It's also been
proven by the past that consensus is such a tricky thing to achieve, and
could cost us time and effort.

Option 1 is the no-brainer choice.

Thanks,
Gaby

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 3:32 PM Mirriam via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:


> Hi Anthony,

>

> Even WG consensus has been tried and tested as a great procedure in the

> past and you can ask Dewole, Sami, Seun etc.....

>

> As a WG, let us not shy away from the fact that in recent past two well

> meaning but inexperienced co-chairs who kept getting things very wrong  got

> selected by voting. Don't get me wrong, voting by ranked choice may be good

> second option.

>

> The fall back to the board also sounds as a reasonable selection process

> with involvement of WG if board can float candidates.

>

> Mirriam

>

> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>

>

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:46 AM, Anthony Ubah

> <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210226/beca7ba1/attachment-0001.html>