[rpd] Secretariat PDWG

[lucilla fornaro]

Dear Mirriam,

First of all, to denigrate past co-chairs effort, which I want to remind
you is voluntary, is not correct.

I don't see how giving members the freedom and responsibility to vote for
co-chairs' elections and being a part of the decision-making process is a
negative thing.  On the contrary, it is the most efficient way to enhance
members' commitment, giving them full access to express their preference.


Lucilla

Il giorno ven 26 feb 2021 alle ore 16:30 Mirriam via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
ha scritto:


> Hi Anthony,

>

> Even WG consensus has been tried and tested as a great procedure in the

> past and you can ask Dewole, Sami, Seun etc.....

>

> As a WG, let us not shy away from the fact that in recent past two well

> meaning but inexperienced co-chairs who kept getting things very wrong  got

> selected by voting. Don't get me wrong, voting by ranked choice may be good

> second option.

>

> The fall back to the board also sounds as a reasonable selection process

> with involvement of WG if board can float candidates.

>

> Mirriam

>

> Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android

> <https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>

>

> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:46 AM, Anthony Ubah

> <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com> wrote:

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210226/9cdcd86d/attachment.html>