[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs

[Sylvain Baya]

Dear PDWG,

Le ven. 19 févr. 2021 12:24, Wijdane Goubi <wijdan.goubi at gmail.com> a
écrit :


> Dear community,

>

> Admittedly, one of the most critical ways that us as individuals can

> influence the decision-making within the community is through voting, which

> is a right and a formal expression of preference for a candidate for a

> proposed resolution of an issue.

>


Hi Wijdane,
Thanks for participating, Sister.

...as you prefer *election* as the *selection* model to be used; the PDWG
should then agree on at least few *criteria* to ensure that we end up with
(i) a reasonable *limited* number of (ii) *sufficiently* capable
candidates.

Are you agreeing to these needs?

Hence, making a set of criteria for a WG participant to become a co-chair is

> going to put obstacles and barriers in front of both voters and candidates.

>

> Therefore, I absolutely don’t go along with the view of putting

> restrictions on candidates no matter what hardships we went through during

> the time of the previous co-chairs otherwise it might lead us to

> misjudgments and discrimination.

>


...i'm sure we can also try to go ahead without
any *criteria* but i can't personally encourage
the PDWG to follow that path.

Of course, that is one way of looking at it; however we are talking about a

> voluntary position which simply should be for people who have a good

> knowledge of CPM and PDP alongside with a sense of commitment, devotion,

> and responsibility towards the community.

>


Sister,  many thanks for your own proposition
of acceptable criteria.

...i'm sure that Noah is following-up ;-)

Shalom,
--sb.

Regards,

>

> Wijdane

>

> Le ven. 19 févr. 2021 à 06:52, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> a écrit :

>

>> Hi PDWG participants,

>>

>> [...]

>>

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210219/87a991a2/attachment.html>