Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs
abscoco at gmail.com
Fri Feb 19 11:50:46 UTC 2021
Le ven. 19 févr. 2021 12:24, Wijdane Goubi <wijdan.goubi at gmail.com> a
> Dear community,
> Admittedly, one of the most critical ways that us as individuals can
> influence the decision-making within the community is through voting, which
> is a right and a formal expression of preference for a candidate for a
> proposed resolution of an issue.
Thanks for participating, Sister.
...as you prefer *election* as the *selection* model to be used; the PDWG
should then agree on at least few *criteria* to ensure that we end up with
(i) a reasonable *limited* number of (ii) *sufficiently* capable
Are you agreeing to these needs?
Hence, making a set of criteria for a WG participant to become a co-chair is
> going to put obstacles and barriers in front of both voters and candidates.
> Therefore, I absolutely don’t go along with the view of putting
> restrictions on candidates no matter what hardships we went through during
> the time of the previous co-chairs otherwise it might lead us to
> misjudgments and discrimination.
...i'm sure we can also try to go ahead without
any *criteria* but i can't personally encourage
the PDWG to follow that path.
Of course, that is one way of looking at it; however we are talking about a
> voluntary position which simply should be for people who have a good
> knowledge of CPM and PDP alongside with a sense of commitment, devotion,
> and responsibility towards the community.
Sister, many thanks for your own proposition
of acceptable criteria.
...i'm sure that Noah is following-up ;-)
> Le ven. 19 févr. 2021 à 06:52, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> a écrit :
>> Hi PDWG participants,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD