Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Criteria for Eligibility or Selection of PDWG Co-Chairs

Sylvain Baya abscoco at
Fri Feb 19 11:50:46 UTC 2021

Dear PDWG,

Le ven. 19 févr. 2021 12:24, Wijdane Goubi <wijdan.goubi at> a
écrit :

> Dear community,


> Admittedly, one of the most critical ways that us as individuals can

> influence the decision-making within the community is through voting, which

> is a right and a formal expression of preference for a candidate for a

> proposed resolution of an issue.


Hi Wijdane,
Thanks for participating, Sister. you prefer *election* as the *selection* model to be used; the PDWG
should then agree on at least few *criteria* to ensure that we end up with
(i) a reasonable *limited* number of (ii) *sufficiently* capable

Are you agreeing to these needs?

Hence, making a set of criteria for a WG participant to become a co-chair is

> going to put obstacles and barriers in front of both voters and candidates.


> Therefore, I absolutely don’t go along with the view of putting

> restrictions on candidates no matter what hardships we went through during

> the time of the previous co-chairs otherwise it might lead us to

> misjudgments and discrimination.


...i'm sure we can also try to go ahead without
any *criteria* but i can't personally encourage
the PDWG to follow that path.

Of course, that is one way of looking at it; however we are talking about a

> voluntary position which simply should be for people who have a good

> knowledge of CPM and PDP alongside with a sense of commitment, devotion,

> and responsibility towards the community.


Sister, many thanks for your own proposition
of acceptable criteria.

...i'm sure that Noah is following-up ;-)




> Wijdane


> Le ven. 19 févr. 2021 à 06:52, Noah <noah at> a écrit :


>> Hi PDWG participants,


>> [...]




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list