Search RPD Archives
[rpd] way forward on the PDWG after the Recall of the co-chairs
amelnaud at gmail.com
Wed Feb 17 08:14:57 UTC 2021
Who appointed you in this role? don’t you think board, staff are following
discussions and can make their own minds and judgment on the discussions
and the outcomes? Or is your intention to influence or bias discussion.
As an interested partly in this discussion, please encourage neutral
observation and give chance to easy and quick resolutions on the issues
You seem to have not learnt from the advise given to you recently on RIPE
Le mar. 16 févr. 2021 à 23:08, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
a écrit :
> Dear Board, all,
> Following the February 10th email from the Board Chair, the PDWG has
> discussed the possible options on the way forward after the Recall of the
> PDWG co-chairs.
> The attached document, already circulated today in the RPD, is a summary
> and conclusions of the discussions reached by the consensus of the PDWG.
> The PDWG hasn't requested any change to the document in the last few
> hours, however it has been updated just to correct a couple of typos (track
> of changes show them).
> As a consequence, the decision is:
> "Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize
> on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census)."
> We should remark, as it has been suggested already by some participants in
> the discussion, that the ideal situation would be, once candidates are
> introduced to the PDWG, we have a constructive discussion in the list (and
> hopefully among the candidates) and some of the candidates withdraw, so an
> actual election process is no longer needed, as it already happened in the
> previous elections. Of course, this can't be guaranteed, so the elections
> process must be ready for that contingence.
> We will await your decision about the timing and the call for candidates.
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> The IPv6 Company
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of
> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized
> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the
> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or
> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including
> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal
> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this
> communication and delete it.
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD