[rpd] WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON: Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs - SUMMARY

[Ibeanusi Elvis]

Dear Jordi, 

Your summary is well elaborated and explicit, likewise makes the entire discussion much more easily comprehensible. Also, as you have pointed out on the options choose from, I still concur with idea that we need to halt everything concerning the PDP decisions, until the Board can organize an on-line elections as soon as possible. I am glad we have been able to reach consensus on this situation and that can finally move our community forward. 

Elvis. 




> On Feb 16, 2021, at 21:15, Paschal Ochang <pascosoft at gmail.com> wrote:

> 

> +1 Jordi for this concise methodological approach. If I can remember very well I was one of the early advocates of halting decisions due to the lack of personnel (co chairs) to moderate PDP discussions. I do support the points where there seems to be a converging consensus. I can see your Thematic and Hermeneutic approach which I applaud.

> 

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:20 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>> wrote:

> Hi all,

> 

> As I've indicated a few days ago, I've elaborated a summary of the discussion on the list, happened until noon CET today.

> 

> Find it attached.

> 

> I'm convinced that some may disagree. I disagree myself with the choice that the consensus shows, however, until the board takes a decision, in order keep my neutrality, I will not explain why, because even if I disagree, I can concede which that choice, and this is what consensus means.

> 

> If anyone believes that I've misinterpreted his/her view (note that the summary is not a literal transcription), please say so, clearly stating your position and justifying the objections. I will consider updating the document with any inputs received until midnight CET before sending it to the board (and copy the list).

> 

> Please, keep it simple, we just want to understand if there are valid objections to option 1, which seems to be the one that reached consensus:

> 

> "Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census)."

> 

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> 

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com <http://www.theipv6company.com/>

> The IPv6 Company

> 

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

> 

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210216/7469b9b2/attachment.html>