[rpd] WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON: Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs - SUMMARY

[Paschal Ochang]

+1 Jordi for this concise methodological approach. If I can remember very
well I was one of the early advocates of halting decisions due to the lack
of personnel (co chairs) to moderate PDP discussions. I do support the
points where there seems to be a converging consensus. I can see your
Thematic and Hermeneutic approach which I applaud.

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 11:20 AM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <
rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:


> Hi all,

>

> As I've indicated a few days ago, I've elaborated a summary of the

> discussion on the list, happened until noon CET today.

>

> Find it attached.

>

> I'm convinced that some may disagree. I disagree myself with the choice

> that the consensus shows, however, until the board takes a decision, in

> order keep my neutrality, I will not explain why, because even if I

> disagree, I can concede which that choice, and this is what consensus means.

>

> If anyone believes that I've misinterpreted his/her view (note that the

> summary is not a literal transcription), please say so, clearly stating

> your position and justifying the objections. I will consider updating the

> document with any inputs received until midnight CET before sending it to

> the board (and copy the list).

>

> Please, keep it simple, we just want to understand if there are valid

> objections to option 1, which seems to be the one that reached consensus:

>

> "Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize

> on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census)."

>

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

>

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210216/645b9862/attachment-0001.html>