Search RPD Archives
   [rpd] Report from Recall Committee
    Daniel Yakmut 
    yakmutd at googlemail.com
       
    Thu Feb 11 16:40:11 UTC 2021
    
    
  
Dear Sarah,
I am not sowing any seed of division, neither I am a peddler of anything 
that is not a reality. I also do not agree with being an ostrich, by 
burying my head to reality.
I also don't have to appreciate the RC, the fact that many did. 
Similarly, the action of the RC may not be necessary right because a 
crowd is applauding them. I am a realist and therefore the current 
situation does not appeal to me.
cheers
Daniel
On 11/02/2021 8:49 am, Sarah Kiden wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2021 at 07:14, Daniel Yakmut <yakmutd at googlemail.com 
> <mailto:yakmutd at googlemail.com>> wrote:
>
>     How can we possibly reach consensus, when the community is sharply
>     divided between winners and losers.
>
>     There is bitterness around and shock around the action of the RC.
>     Maybe when we get over the situation. However, delay is imminent.
>
>
> I don’t think this “bitterness” and “shock” you are peddling is shared 
> by many. In fact, continuously pushing this narrative is an attempt at 
> planting the seed of division, which we should not accept.
>
> I have seen messages of appreciation to the Recall Committee on the 
> list (many of us appreciate their work). That said, we need to move 
> forward now and we need to do so as a community.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sarah
>
>
>     Daniel
>
>     On Thu, Feb 11, 2021, 8:04 AM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com
>     <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
>
>         The board has asked us to make a recommendation to them.
>         Ideally, if possible, we should try to achieve consensus
>         around a recommendation in time for their next meeting to
>         avoid further delays as noted by the board.
>
>         Owen
>
>
>>         On Feb 10, 2021, at 11:04 , Sarah Kiden <skiden at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:skiden at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi Jordi,
>>
>>         I would suggest that we wait for the outcome of the Board
>>         meeting and then take it from there. I believe some
>>         recommendations were made in the report from the Recall
>>         Committee, which I believe will be a good starting place.
>>
>>         Regards,
>>
>>         Sarah
>>
>>
>>         On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 5:51 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD
>>         <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>> wrote:
>>
>>             So ... PDWG colleagues. We need to move.
>>
>>             We need to answer questions and tell the board:
>>
>>             1. We want to halt everything until we have elections:
>>                     1.1 On-line elections in a few weeks with the
>>             previous electoral census?
>>                     1.2 On-site elections, we don't know when?
>>
>>             2. We want the board to choose 2 transition chairs?
>>
>>             3. We want to nominate ourselves a few names for
>>             transition chairs and let the board to decide, once they
>>             confirm their willingness to take the job ?
>>
>>             I don't think other choices are feasible in one week from
>>             now ... for example, deciding among us by email the 2
>>             cochairs and not enter in an endless discussion.
>>
>>             (note that the order is arbitrary, I'm not suggesting
>>             anything in the list above, I'm happy with any choice IF
>>             we are able to reach consensus ourselves by next week)
>>
>>             Regards,
>>             Jordi
>>             @jordipalet
>>
>>
>>
>>             El 10/2/21 18:18, "chair at afrinic.net
>>             <mailto:chair at afrinic.net>" <chair at afrinic.net
>>             <mailto:chair at afrinic.net>> escribió:
>>
>>                 Dear Policy Development Working Group,
>>
>>                 The AFRINIC Board of Directors would like to thank
>>             the Recall
>>                 Committee for its report.  The Board has taken note
>>             of the findings
>>                 and decision of the Recall Committee to recall the
>>             two Policy
>>                 Development Working Group co-Chairs with immediate
>>             effect.
>>
>>                 It is unlikely that the Policy Development Process
>>             can function in
>>                 the absence of a Working Group Chair. The Board would
>>             like to
>>                 encourage the Policy Development Working Group to
>>             find a way forward.
>>
>>                 The Board is scheduled to meet on Wednesday 17
>>             February to discuss the matter.
>>
>>                 Regards,
>>                 S. Moonesamy
>>
>>                 Board Chair, AFRINIC
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>                 RPD mailing list
>>             RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>             https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>             <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>
>>
>>
>>             **********************************************
>>             IPv4 is over
>>             Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>>             http://www.theipv6company.com
>>             <http://www.theipv6company.com/>
>>             The IPv6 Company
>>
>>             This electronic message contains information which may be
>>             privileged or confidential. The information is intended
>>             to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named
>>             above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
>>             copying, distribution or use of the contents of this
>>             information, even if partially, including attached files,
>>             is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal
>>             offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware
>>             that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the
>>             contents of this information, even if partially,
>>             including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be
>>             considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
>>             original sender to inform about this communication and
>>             delete it.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>             _______________________________________________
>>             RPD mailing list
>>             RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>             https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>             <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         RPD mailing list
>>         RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         RPD mailing list
>         RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>
> -- 
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210211/47c3b620/attachment-0001.html>
    
    
More information about the RPD
mailing list