[rpd] WE NEED YOUR INPUT, MAXIMUM BY TUESDAY 16TH NOON: Decision of way forward for new (transition or elected) co-chairs

[lucilla fornaro]

Hello Jordi,

Thanks for simplifying the choices we need to go forward, this way.
I am personally with both options 1 & 2 for the following reasons :
The co-chairs election is a community based process, so I really do not see
the necessity of giving the board the ability to pick new co-chairs
(transition or not) . The situation we are in is indeed exceptional, but we
should still stick to the normal process that we are used to and that is
the fairest one: Have elections (Online or not, it’s an easy matter than
can be works out amongst us). As for halting the PDP decisions until we can
do that, I believe there is no harm in that at all, at least until
everything is organized and back to normal.

Regards,

Lucilla

Il giorno gio 11 feb 2021 alle ore 17:47 JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <
rpd at afrinic.net> ha scritto:


> Hi all,

>

> Following the previous email, we have 4 choices for selecting the new

> co-chairs:

>

> 1. Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize

> on-line elections in a few weeks (with the previous electoral census).

>

> 2. Halt everything regarding PDP decisions, until the board can organize

> an in-person meeting and then we can have on-site elections (we don't know

> when we will have a new in-person meeting).

>

> 3. Ask the board to choose 2 transition co-chairs, so we can have

> elections in the future (option 2 above).

>

> 4. Nominate ourselves a few names for transition co-chairs and let the

> board to decide among them, once they confirm their willingness to take the

> job, so we can have elections in the future (option 2 above).

>

> Note that each person supporting/objecting one or serveral choices, should

> briefly detail what are the pros and cons that he/she understands need to

> be considered. Note that this is a consensus base decision, not a voting,

> and the objections should be as less subjective as possible and looking for

> the good of the overall community, not personal or business interests.

>

> If you think that option 3 or 4 are the right ones, this is not the time

> to set any conditions or nominate people. Will need to define specific time

> frame after the decision is taken. Otherwise, may not be able to reach

> consensus quickly.

>

> REMARK: We need to tell the board our decision, by consensus by next

> Tuesday (16th February), so only comments received up to Tuesday noon could

> be considered in the final summary.

>

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

>

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20210211/011bc71f/attachment.html>