[rpd] Statement from Legal Counsel

[ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE]

Dear Noah,
Neither of the Co-chairs is subscribed to the Members list, as we do not
own a single IP.
The Members list is not an extension of the rpd. We only took into
consideration issues raised on the rpd mailing list.
We care about AFRINIC and to the best of our ability, we shall do what we
think is best for the community as directed by the community.
Can we please confirm some of these things rather than making a false
accusation on the mailing list?

Co-Chairs
PDWG



On Thu, 17 Dec 2020, 20:46 Noah, <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:


> Sunday,

>

> On Tue, 15 Dec 2020, 19:27 Sunday Folayan, <sfolayan at skannet.com> wrote:

>

>> 1. The Co-Chairs followed the process as contained in the CPM.

>>

>

> Take your time and go through the archives before you make such claims.

>

> FWIW, read also the various appeal documents that were submitted to AC and

> extensively supported by members of this working group before you claim

> cochairs followed the process.

>

>> 2. An impact Assessment was made initially. Legal opinion should have

>> been sought at that point.

>>

>> 3. Another impact assessment was made after the policy has reached

>> consensus. Which is fine, no need to panic

>>

>

> Those impact assessment are important in ensuring that policy development

> process and when cochair ignore them then its a problem.

>

> 4. If indeed the PDWG overstepped its bound, the Board can simply not

>> approve the policy, and explain why, to the PDWG.

>>

> To my understanding and Madhvi can confirm this, the cochairs (Abdulkarim

> and Moses) are subscribed to the members list, and a resource members and

> others reached out to Afrinic with queries on impact of the controversial

> **resource transfer policy** the very cochairs purported to have achieved

> consensus.

>

> The feedback from AFRINIC members services speaks for itself and you very

> well know what it is because you also contributed to that discussion.

>

> Did cochair also take those concerns from AFRINIC members services into

> considering when they in their purported second declaration of consensus

> after retracting the their initial declaration of consensus or they ignored

> those concerns like they ignored have showed to careless about AFRINIC

> staff impact analysis of DPP.

>

> 5. There was no need sharing herein, the Email from the CEO to the

>> Co-Chairs. What was that supposed to achieve?

>>

> The last I checked, openness and transparency is what this community has

> been asking for from AFRINIC leadership for years.

>

> Todays leadership is ensuring that unless ofcourse you have a problem with

> that.

>

> Kudos to the legal counsel and CEO for their attempt to share their

> opinion with this community and the workinggroup after all they are

> custodian of the organization AFRINIC last I checked.

>

> Noah

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>


-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201218/9e14594e/attachment-0001.html>