[rpd] Community Feedback

[Sunday Folayan]

Dan

Yes, the Co-Chairs deserve some breathing space. That is a fact. I also 
think some of the emails from the co-chairs are needless.

We can stop the pendulum from swinging. It takes all parties.

Sunday.

On 12/2/20 2:38 PM, Daniel Yakmut via RPD wrote:
>
> Good Day to All,
>
> There are a few sensible responses to settling the dust arising from 
> the recall attempts of the current Co-Chairs and the new proposal to 
> make changes to the CPM on recall procedure. Thank you Egbon Sunday, 
> yours is calming.
>
> However I will want to say thus:
>
> 1. There wouldn't have been all these back and forth if not that some 
> members of the community feel that their opinions must always be 
> accepted. This is clearly demonstrated by the Authors of the recall 
> document, coming with trumped up charges to secure a Recall.
>
> 2. The appeal for the Author of the Policy on Changes on the 
> provisions of recall to withdraw the proposal is a good call. But, 
> again the Co-authors are duty bound to act on the proposal, if it is 
> not withdrawn. Importantly, there is no urgency on the matter. Either 
> way the changes being advocated cannot possibly be use in the current 
> Recall procedure, the existing provisions will apply. Therefore, we 
> should calm nerves knowing that the Co-Chairs will not sit in 
> judgement on matters that affects them as been insinuated by the usual 
> "suspects".
>
> 3. For me I strongly believe that within us we can resolve all 
> matters, there are still a few good men/women that see things clearly 
> and objectively. If we must add an outsider, we can have one in the 
> Recall committee.
>
> 4. While we await the actions of the Board on the constitution of the 
> Recall committee and the final action of the committee. I will suggest 
> that members should give the Co-Chairs some breathing space, the 
> bashing and harassment is not helping.
>
>
> Simply,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> On 02/12/2020 12:47 pm, Sunday Folayan wrote:
>>
>> Dear Co-Chairs,
>>
>> I am still hoping the said proposal will be withdrawn by the author, 
>> or at the least, wait for us to learn from the implementation of the 
>> current recall provisions in the CPM.
>>
>> Please stick with the laid down process. There is no emergency, or a 
>> reason for one.
>>
>> Greetings to the two Co-Chairs. Please relax ... uneasy lies the 
>> mouth that eats hot Aloco!
>>
>> Sunday.
>>
>> On 12/2/20 5:29 AM, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE wrote:
>>> Dear PDWG Members,
>>> We want to acknowledge the proposal on Co-Chair Recall process and 
>>> the call for us to invoke section 3.6 of the CPM given the lack of 
>>> clarity of the current section on the recall process.
>>> We note that a few have accused of not taking over similar 
>>> discussions in the past and regarded it as gross misconduct.
>>>  We hope the Community would, in the next few days give us a clear 
>>> direction as to which way to go. We hope to feed the Community back 
>>> on our decisions by Saturday 5th December 2020.
>>> We thank you for your understanding, cooperation and the continued 
>>> trust in us.
>>> Thanks
>>> Co-Chairs
>>> PDWG
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>,Weekly Bulletin 
>>> <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
>>> <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
>>> <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RPD mailing list
>>> RPD at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201203/f6afcce7/attachment.html>