[rpd] Community Feedback

[Jaco Kroon]

Hi Ekaterina,

Where's the attack?

We're stating there isn't an emergency and that the normal (current)
process as per (current) CPM should be followed in response to a request
for feedback.

Kind Regards,
Jaco

n 2020/12/02 16:04, Ekaterina Kalugina wrote:


> Dear community,

>

> First of all, I would like to note that it is not fair to attack the

> co-chairs on the decision to invoke the article 3.6 of the CPM. This

> idea is not their initiative, rather it was proposed by a community

> member and all the co-chairs are doing its listening to the concerns

> of the community, as their duties require.

>

> Secondly, the co-chairs are not making any unilateral decisions and

> instead are asking for community feedback on the matter, again, as

> their duties require. But instead of giving the necessary feedback,

> some of the members seem to focus on personally attacking the chairs

> instead. Also, I really doubt that "African dictators" would ask for

> the feedback of the community. Please let us stay rational here.

>

> Thirdly, I fail to see how the proposed policy would benefit the

> co-chairs. All it does is add a few mechanisms that ensure objectivity

> and transparency of the recall process. This policy would ensure that

> the chairs are recalled for a good reason and not because their

> decisions got in the way of some personal agendas.

>

> So let us focus on keeping the process as fair and objective as possible. 

>

> Best wishes, 

> Ekaterina 

>

>

> On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, 14:39 Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net

> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>> wrote:

>

>     Good Day to All,

>

>     There are a few sensible responses to settling the dust arising

>     from the recall attempts of the current Co-Chairs and the new

>     proposal to make changes to the CPM on recall procedure. Thank you

>     Egbon Sunday, yours is calming.

>

>     However I will want to say thus:

>

>     1. There wouldn't have been all these back and forth if not that

>     some members of the community feel that their opinions must always

>     be accepted. This is clearly demonstrated by the Authors of the

>     recall document, coming with trumped up charges to secure a Recall.

>

>     2. The appeal for the Author of the Policy on Changes on the

>     provisions of recall to withdraw the proposal is a good call. But,

>     again the Co-authors are duty bound to act on the proposal, if it

>     is not withdrawn. Importantly, there is no urgency on the matter.

>     Either way the changes being advocated cannot possibly be use in

>     the current Recall procedure, the existing provisions will apply.

>     Therefore, we should calm nerves knowing that the Co-Chairs will

>     not sit in judgement on matters that affects them as been

>     insinuated by the usual "suspects".

>

>     3. For me I strongly believe that within us we can resolve all

>     matters, there are still a few good men/women that see things

>     clearly and objectively. If we must add an outsider, we can have

>     one in the Recall committee.

>

>     4. While we await the actions of the Board on the constitution of

>     the Recall committee and the final action of the committee. I will

>     suggest that members should give the Co-Chairs some breathing

>     space, the bashing and harassment is not helping.

>

>

>     Simply,

>

>     Daniel

>

>

>     On 02/12/2020 12:47 pm, Sunday Folayan wrote:

>>

>>     Dear Co-Chairs,

>>

>>     I am still hoping the said proposal will be withdrawn by the

>>     author, or at the least, wait for us to learn from the

>>     implementation of the current recall provisions in the CPM.

>>

>>     Please stick with the laid down process. There is no emergency,

>>     or a reason for one.

>>

>>     Greetings to the two Co-Chairs. Please relax ... uneasy lies the

>>     mouth that eats hot Aloco!

>>

>>     Sunday.

>>

>>     On 12/2/20 5:29 AM, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE wrote:

>>>     Dear PDWG Members, 

>>>     We want to acknowledge the proposal on Co-Chair Recall process

>>>     and the call for us to invoke section 3.6 of the CPM given the

>>>     lack of clarity of the current section on the recall process. 

>>>     We note that a few have accused of not taking over similar

>>>     discussions in the past and regarded it as gross misconduct.

>>>      We hope the Community would, in the next few days give us a

>>>     clear direction as to which way to go. We hope to feed the

>>>     Community back on our decisions by Saturday 5th December 2020.

>>>     We thank you for your understanding, cooperation and the

>>>     continued trust in us.

>>>     Thanks

>>>     Co-Chairs

>>>     PDWG 

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>>     Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin

>>>     <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal

>>>     <http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal

>>>     <https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>

>>>

>>>

>>>     _______________________________________________

>>>     RPD mailing list

>>>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>>>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

>>

>>     _______________________________________________

>>     RPD mailing list

>>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

>     _______________________________________________

>     RPD mailing list

>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>     <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201202/787efe4b/attachment.html>