[rpd] Community Feedback

[Mirriam]

 Hi Ekatarina 

I read your email and I noted another baseless claim that people have personal agendas.

Please spell those agendas as you claim.

I am waiting.

Mirriam

    On Wednesday, December 2, 2020, 5:05:15 PM GMT+3, Ekaterina Kalugina <kay.k.prof at gmail.com> wrote:  
 
 Dear community,
First of all, I would like to note that it is not fair to attack the co-chairs on the decision to invoke the article 3.6 of the CPM. This idea is not their initiative, rather it was proposed by a community member and all the co-chairs are doing its listening to the concerns of the community, as their duties require.
Secondly, the co-chairs are not making any unilateral decisions and instead are asking for community feedback on the matter, again, as their duties require. But instead of giving the necessary feedback, some of the members seem to focus on personally attacking the chairs instead. Also, I really doubt that "African dictators" would ask for the feedback of the community. Please let us stay rational here.
Thirdly, I fail to see how the proposed policy would benefit the co-chairs. All it does is add a few mechanisms that ensure objectivity and transparency of the recall process. This policy would ensure that the chairs are recalled for a good reason and not because their decisions got in the way of some personal agendas.
So let us focus on keeping the process as fair and objective as possible. 
Best wishes, Ekaterina 

On Wed, 2 Dec 2020, 14:39 Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

  
Good Day to All,
 
There are a few sensible responses to settling the dust arising from the recall attempts of the current Co-Chairs and the new proposal to make changes to the CPM on recall procedure. Thank you Egbon Sunday, yours is calming.
 
However I will want to say thus:
 
1. There wouldn't have been all these back and forth if not that some members of the community feel that their opinions must always be accepted. This is clearly demonstrated by the Authors of the recall document, coming with trumped up charges to secure a Recall. 
 
 
2. The appeal for the Author of the Policy on Changes on the provisions of recall to withdraw the proposal is a good call. But, again the Co-authors are duty bound to act on the proposal, if it is not withdrawn. Importantly, there is no urgency on the matter. Either way the changes being advocated cannot possibly be use in the current Recall procedure, the existing provisions will apply. Therefore, we should calm nerves knowing that the Co-Chairs will not sit in judgement on matters that affects them as been insinuated by the usual "suspects".
 
3. For me I strongly believe that within us we can resolve all matters, there are still a few good men/women that see things clearly and objectively. If we must add an outsider, we can have one in the Recall committee.
 
4. While we await the actions of the Board on the constitution of the Recall committee and the final action of the committee. I will suggest that members should give the Co-Chairs some breathing space, the bashing and harassment is not helping.
 

 
 
Simply,
 
Daniel
 
 

 
 On 02/12/2020 12:47 pm, Sunday Folayan wrote:
  
 
Dear Co-Chairs,
 I am still hoping the said proposal will be withdrawn by the author, or at the least, wait for us to learn from the implementation of the current recall provisions in the CPM.
 
Please stick with the laid down process. There is no emergency, or a reason for one.
 
Greetings to the two Co-Chairs. Please relax ... uneasy lies the mouth that eats hot Aloco!
 
 
Sunday.
 
 On 12/2/20 5:29 AM, ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE wrote:
  
                 Dear PDWG Members,  We want to acknowledge the proposal on Co-Chair Recall process and the call for us to invoke section 3.6 of the CPM given the lack of clarity of the current section on the recall process. 
  We note that a few have accused of not taking over similar discussions in the past and regarded it as gross misconduct.
  We hope the Community would, in the next few days give us a clear direction as to which way to go. We hope to feed the Community back on our decisions by Saturday 5th December 2020.
 We thank you for your understanding, cooperation and the continued trust in us.
 Thanks
 Co-Chairs
 PDWG 
   
 
 
 
                   
 Website, Weekly Bulletin UGPortal PGPortal 
  
  _______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
 
 
  _______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
 
 _______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201202/20a320d3/attachment-0001.html>