Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Appeal against the consensus determination on proposal AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer Policy)

Frank Habicht geier at geier.ne.tz
Wed Oct 21 17:59:00 UTC 2020


Hi,

inline...

On 21/10/2020 18:25, Ekaterina Kalugina wrote:

> Dear Alain,

>

> First of all, you say that the changes made by the authors during the

> last call are not editorial changes and therefore cannot be accepted as

> per the PDP. Yet nowhere in the CPM this is stated explicitly.

>

> In this appeal you also stated that the need for some policy arose as

> early as 2015. The solution to this problem has been dragged out for

> over 5 years and now that we have a functional proposal you are coming

^^^^^^^^^^ functional in *your*
opinion


> up with excuses that are insignificant in the context of the need of

> this policy.

^^^^ I think you wanted to say "a policy" because the previous
sentence talks about "some policy".



> The changes done to the Resource Transfer Policy technically do not

> violate the CPM, as the text does not state that only editorial changes

> are allowed.

... but in the the spirit and understanding of many here. nevermind.
1. Technically the text does not any changes are allowed (others have
shown this).
2. more importantly: Technically, this last call period is here for a
purpose (do you agree?), and that is to give opportunity to mailing list
members to voice objection to the conclusions at the meeting.
I hope you can see that this is exactly what is happening.
You should now argue that co-chairs should ignore all discussions during
last-call.


> In addition, nowhere in the CPM it states that the chairs

> are not allowed to propose changes that reflect the concerns of the

> community.


do you mean "whole community" - in general consensus?

[snip]> To be fair, I do understand some of the concerns you raised in your

> appeal, but I believe that passing this policy now would be much more

> valuable than dragging this process for many more years. The progress

> made on this policy is very important and I think it is high time we

> thought about the benefit to the community above the subjective

> interpretations of the PDP.


Is this a good time to ask what the benefit to the community is (or will
be)?
I sure believe that some PDWG members will benefit, because they profit
from IP transfers.
But I prefer these not to be counted as "community benefits".

Thanks,
Frank



>

> Best,

>

> Ekaterina 

>

>

> On Tue, Oct 20, 2020 at 9:45 PM Vivien ASSANGBE WOTTO

> <vassangbewotto at benintelecoms.bj

> <mailto:vassangbewotto at benintelecoms.bj>> wrote:

>

>

> Dear Committee Members,

> Me, Vivien A. W , I took part in the discussion.

> I completely support this appeal

>

> ---

> Ensemble / together ……

>

> Cordialement,

>

> Best regards,

>

> _____________________________________________

>

> G. Vivien  ASSANGBE WOTTO

>

>

> BÉNIN TELECOMS INFRASTRUCTURES SA

>

> DPM / SGI / Centre IP

>

> Tel: 00229 90 09 68 29   -   00229 21 14 98 58

>

> email: vassangbewotto at benintelecoms.bj

> <mailto:vassangbewotto at benintelecoms.bj>

>

>                vivien at intnet.bj <mailto:vivien at intnet.bj>

>

>

> _____________________________________________

>

> Le 20-10-2020 17:52, ALAIN AINA a écrit :

> > Dear PDWG Appeal Committee Members,

> >

> > Please find attached, an appeal against the consensus determination on

> > proposal AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT04 (Resource Transfer Policy) for your

> > consideration.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > —Adeola A. P. Aina

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

> <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>




More information about the RPD mailing list