[rpd] Appeal against the declaration of consensus on proposal Resource Transfer Policy

[Paschal Ochang]

I keep hearing people quoting the CPM or PDP process here but I can bet you
that if a legal counsel is to moderate our discussions a lot of us violate
the process intentionally or unintentionally so some times adopting best
practices while accommodating laid down principles is a good way to go.
I also saw the mail notifying the cochairs of the appeal as if threatening
them that an appeal is coming.
While I believe in following the process I also believe in the principle of
doing it in a civil manner and with the ideology of do unto others what you
want others to do to you. I have seen calls here for moderation and I
believe if these moderation is adopted a lot of us carrying out certain
rhetoric will be banned due to lack of respect for constituted authority.
In the end we should remeber that we are all here for one goal and not all
these personal vendetta of name calling. Let it rest.

On Monday, October 19, 2020, Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:


> My take here is that I am questioning the spirit of the appeal. But of

> course the appellant has the right to appeal.

>

> I understand the process clearly, I was questioning why would someone be

> telling the Co-chairs to note the forwarding of an appeal, when it is not

> their perogative.

>

> I would not mind going on an unwinding road if it leads to a result, but

> taking a trip on such road knowing fully well it will result to null, it

> shouldn't be called a PDP.

>

> Simply

> Daniel

>

> On Oct 19, 2020 8:58 AM, "Noah" <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

>

>

>

> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, 10:13 Daniel Yakmut via RPD, <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

>

>> Is it the Co-Chairs that should confirm receipt of the appeal? I thought

>> it is their action that is being appealed. If we claim we know the process

>> the appeal process is handled by the appeal committee. So the confirmation

>> should be directed to them, not the Co-Chairs.

>>

>

> On the other hand, you dont seem to understand the process.

>

> 1st step.

> The appeal against the action of the cochair on this proposal was sent to

> the appeal committee first and the supporters of the appeal as indicated in

> the document wrote to the committee to confirm their support.

>

> 2nd step.

> The appellant then did the needful as per the appeal process by informing

> the working group that there is an appeal and members of the working group

> who support the appeal have continued to state as such.

>

>

>

> That not withstanding, this appeal was done in bad faith

>>

> Since when is following the PDP process which gives the right to the

> working group to appeal bad faith.

>

>

> and will take us very long and torturous path.

>>

>

> Called the policy development process.

>

>> The most sensible action, which I agreed with, was the suggestion by

>> Jordi for an extension of the last call.

>>

>

> Shortcuts dont form part of the policy development even countries

> regulations and laws take process as per the law.

>

> The appeal should be ignored in favour of a more realistic suggestion by

>> Jordi. I consider it as the only suggestion deviod of any sentiment.

>>

>

> Yet the process allows appeal. Are you against the PDP.

>

> Noah

>

>>

>> Simply,

>>

>> Daniel

>> On 16/10/2020 7:48 pm, Jaco Kroon wrote:

>>

>> Hi,

>>

>> I also support this appeal.

>>

>> Could the PDWG chairs please confirm receipt of appeal and confirm that

>> all process requirements have been met?

>>

>> Kind Regards,

>> Jaco

>> On 2020/10/15 14:46, Gregoire EHOUMI via RPD wrote:

>>

>> Hello,

>>

>> As per appeal process, see below a copy of my email to appeal committee.

>>

>> Thank you and best regards,

>>

>> --

>> Gregoire Ehoumi

>>

>>

>> Begin forwarded message:

>>

>> *From: *Gregoire EHOUMI <gregoire.ehoumi at yahoo.fr>

>> *Subject: **Appeal against the declaration of consensus on proposal

>> Resource Transfer Policy*

>> *Date: *October 15, 2020 at 8:16:43 AM EDT

>> *To: *pdwg-appeal at afrinic.net

>> *Cc: *Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>,

>> Darwin Costa <dc at darwincosta.com>, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com>

>>

>> Dear Appeal Committee,

>>

>> I attach in PDF the document referenced in the subject of this email.

>>

>> Please confirm receipt and that no information is missing before the

>> applicable deadlines.

>>

>> I also copy community members who have participated in this discussion

>> supporting this appeal.

>>

>> I look forward to hearing from you.

>>

>> --

>> Gregoire Ehoumi

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

>

>


-- 
Kind regards,

Paschal.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201019/9f8559a5/attachment-0001.html>