[rpd] Appeal against the declaration of consensus on proposal Resource Transfer Policy

[Daniel Yakmut]

My take here is that I am questioning the spirit of the appeal. But of
course the appellant has the right to appeal.

I understand the process clearly, I was questioning why would someone be
telling the Co-chairs to note the forwarding of an appeal, when it is not
their perogative.

I would not mind going on an unwinding road if it leads to a result, but
taking a trip on such road knowing fully well it will result to null, it
shouldn't be called a PDP.

Simply
Daniel

On Oct 19, 2020 8:58 AM, "Noah" <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:



On Mon, 19 Oct 2020, 10:13 Daniel Yakmut via RPD, <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:


> Is it the Co-Chairs that should confirm receipt of the appeal? I thought

> it is their action that is being appealed. If we claim we know the process

> the appeal process is handled by the appeal committee. So the confirmation

> should be directed to them, not the Co-Chairs.

>


On the other hand, you dont seem to understand the process.

1st step.
The appeal against the action of the cochair on this proposal was sent to
the appeal committee first and the supporters of the appeal as indicated in
the document wrote to the committee to confirm their support.

2nd step.
The appellant then did the needful as per the appeal process by informing
the working group that there is an appeal and members of the working group
who support the appeal have continued to state as such.



That not withstanding, this appeal was done in bad faith

>

Since when is following the PDP process which gives the right to the
working group to appeal bad faith.


and will take us very long and torturous path.

>


Called the policy development process.


> The most sensible action, which I agreed with, was the suggestion by Jordi

> for an extension of the last call.

>


Shortcuts dont form part of the policy development even countries
regulations and laws take process as per the law.

The appeal should be ignored in favour of a more realistic suggestion by

> Jordi. I consider it as the only suggestion deviod of any sentiment.

>


Yet the process allows appeal. Are you against the PDP.

Noah


>

> Simply,

>

> Daniel

> On 16/10/2020 7:48 pm, Jaco Kroon wrote:

>

> Hi,

>

> I also support this appeal.

>

> Could the PDWG chairs please confirm receipt of appeal and confirm that

> all process requirements have been met?

>

> Kind Regards,

> Jaco

> On 2020/10/15 14:46, Gregoire EHOUMI via RPD wrote:

>

> Hello,

>

> As per appeal process, see below a copy of my email to appeal committee.

>

> Thank you and best regards,

>

> --

> Gregoire Ehoumi

>

>

> Begin forwarded message:

>

> *From: *Gregoire EHOUMI <gregoire.ehoumi at yahoo.fr>

> *Subject: **Appeal against the declaration of consensus on proposal

> Resource Transfer Policy*

> *Date: *October 15, 2020 at 8:16:43 AM EDT

> *To: *pdwg-appeal at afrinic.net

> *Cc: *Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>, Noah <noah at neo.co.tz>,

> Darwin Costa <dc at darwincosta.com>, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com>

>

> Dear Appeal Committee,

>

> I attach in PDF the document referenced in the subject of this email.

>

> Please confirm receipt and that no information is missing before the

> applicable deadlines.

>

> I also copy community members who have participated in this discussion

> supporting this appeal.

>

> I look forward to hearing from you.

>

> --

> Gregoire Ehoumi

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201019/79ddb9c0/attachment-0001.html>