[rpd] Transfer Policy Proposal v.3.docx

[Fernando Frediani]

+1
Have the same view as Noah's below.

Fernando

On 09/10/2020 12:16, Noah wrote:

>

>

> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:54 PM Mike Burns <mike at iptrading.com 

> <mailto:mike at iptrading.com>> wrote:

>

>     **

>

>     Fees avoided by legacy status are a very small issue here,

>

>

> Mike I am not surprised by your subjective opinion above. As such, be 

> reminded that legacy space holders are benefitting from various 

> services which are made possible from fees paid by AFRINIC resource 

> members. So this is not a small issue if others have to bleed money 

> for legacy space holders to enjoy freely.

>

>     not something that should delay this important policy.

>

>

> What is the rush. Shall we not follow the policy development process 

> just because you think this particular proposal is so important 

> because it's open ended which is what you would like to see.

>

> What is important is that the*PDP process must be followed to the 

> letter* and all pending issues with this proposal and the other 

> inter-rir transfer policy proposal must be addressed and that includes 

> the impact on AFRINIC Ltd which I am sure you careless about.

>

> Cheers,

> Noah

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201009/fa90d7e6/attachment.html>