[rpd] Transfer Policy Proposal v.3.docx

[Fernando Frediani]

+1
Have the same view as Noah's below.

Fernando

On 09/10/2020 12:16, Noah wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 5:54 PM Mike Burns <mike at iptrading.com 
> <mailto:mike at iptrading.com>> wrote:
>
>     **
>
>     Fees avoided by legacy status are a very small issue here,
>
>
> Mike I am not surprised by your subjective opinion above. As such, be 
> reminded that legacy space holders are benefitting from various 
> services which are made possible from fees paid by AFRINIC resource 
> members. So this is not a small issue if others have to bleed money 
> for legacy space holders to enjoy freely.
>
>     not something that should delay this important policy.
>
>
> What is the rush. Shall we not follow the policy development process 
> just because you think this particular proposal is so important 
> because it's open ended which is what you would like to see.
>
> What is important is that the*PDP process must be followed to the 
> letter* and all pending issues with this proposal and the other 
> inter-rir transfer policy proposal must be addressed and that includes 
> the impact on AFRINIC Ltd which I am sure you careless about.
>
> Cheers,
> Noah
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201009/fa90d7e6/attachment.html>