[rpd] End of Last call

[Fernando Frediani]

I see a chain of repetition of arguments trying to minimize the 
Co-Chairs wrong decisions. To those who keep repeating it over and over 
please read carefully below:

-The fact that Co-Chais do voluntary work it is irrelevant to the 
context of what is being discussed here. This does NOT allow them to 
skip the PDP for the declaration of consensus.
-The possibility that Co-Chais may have taken the recent decisions in 
good faith doesn't change anything to the context of what is being 
discussed here. This does NOT allow them not to follow the PDP for the 
declaration of consensus.
-The possibility that Co-Chais may be working hard and trying to do 
their best in their role is irrelevant to the context of what is being 
discussed here. This does NOT allow them not follow the PDP for the 
declaration of consensus.
- The fact that many people are questioning their decisions and saying 
they have not followed the PDP is NOT an attack or aggression to them. 
People are stating many objective points that show violations of the PDP 
and this has not been responded satisfactory by them. Please avoid 
oversensitiveness when the arguments lack.

Fernando

On 08/10/2020 20:15, Wijdane Goubi wrote:

> Hello all,

>

> First of all, I’d like to thank the co-chairs for the enormous effort 

> they did and are still doing to manage the pdp. They are being 

> underestimated for all the good voluntary job they’ve done so far.

>

> As said before, the stability of the region is primordial and whoever 

> cares about the interest of the African region cares to implement this 

> policy as soon as possible. The process has been followed from A to Z 

> and it is only normal to end the last call and pass the policies that 

> deserve to be passed.

>

> Besides this, you can’t demand people to behave according to the CPM 

> when you’re not doing it yourself. Any appeal or objection now is 

> deemed invalid so let’s move on and focus on how to improve the region 

> even more. This is one step ahead but there can be several ones. So 

> let us stop wasting time fighting and spend more of it working forward.

>

>

> Wijdane

>

> Le ven. 9 oct. 2020 à 00:19, Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net 

> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>> a écrit :

>

>     If the entire discussion is laced with clues pls unveil them. I

>     don't have to go treasure hunting, when there is none.

>

>     For now I am clueless on what you really want to achieve.

>

>     On Oct 8, 2020 11:06 PM, "Noah" <noah at neo.co.tz

>     <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:

>

>

>         On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 12:55 AM Daniel Yakmut

>         <yakmutd at googlemail.com <mailto:yakmutd at googlemail.com>> wrote:

>

>             Dear Noah/ all

>

>             I hope you avail yourself to be a co-chair at the next

>             available opportunity and we will see how you will act and

>             how long you will survive our onslaught.

>

>

>         I would do a very simple voluntary role of following the PDP

>         rather than countlessly ignore working group concerns and err

>         repeatedly in hope that folk wont hold co-chairs accountable.

>

>

>             That aside, the Co-chairs are not zombies

>

>

>         Very funny you say that....

>

>             so we should expect them to do some thinking and carry out

>             decisions. So they have acted within the guiding framework

>             of our documents.

>

>

>         So you think....

>

>

>             Similarly, as much as some oppose every action of the

>             Co-chairs as been informed bad faith. We have several

>             others and overwhelming in number that are with the

>             Co-chairs and believe their actions are for the best

>             interest of the community.

>

>

>         We are not here for the best interest of the community because

>         some interests can be harmful to the community. So save us

>         that rhetoric.

>

>         We are here to follow the PDP and collaborate within its scope.

>

>             So you cannot flatly conclude that they don't have the

>             interest of the community.

>

>

>         Three words for you.... "Policy Development Process".

>

>

>             It could also be argued that you and others with similar

>             views are anti the community, from the sustain oppositions

>             on this matter. Again let us act on issues divulge of

>             sentiments.

>

>

>         I hear anti-community, you really don't have a clue, do you.?

>

>         Noah

>

>

>     _______________________________________________

>     RPD mailing list

>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>     <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201008/8613515c/attachment.html>