[rpd] End of Last call

[Daniel Yakmut]

Dear Noah/ all,

For all intent and purposes, everyone loves sitting at the passenger seat
of a car. It provides you the opportunity to call anyone driving a bad
driver.

I hope you avail yourself to be a co-chair at the next available
opportunity and we will see how you will act and how long you will survive
our onslaught.

That aside, the Co-chairs are not zombies so we should expect them to do
some thinking and carry out decisions. So they have acted within the
guiding framework of our documents. However I can see quotes flying around
that they defaulted.

Similarly, as much as some oppose every action of the Co-chairs as been
informed bad faith. We have several others and overwhelming in number that
are with the Co-chairs and believe their actions are for the best interest
of the community. So you cannot flatly conclude that they don't have the
interest of the community.

It could also be argued that you and others with similar views are anti the
community, from the sustain oppositions on this matter. Again let us act on
issues divulge of sentiments.

Simply,
Daniel

On Oct 8, 2020 9:27 PM, "Noah" <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:


>

> On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 10:59 PM ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE <

> oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote:

>

>> Dear Jordi and PDWG,

>> *We made sure we followed the CPM to the letter on this issue,*

>>

>

> You did not.

>

>

>> and we believe that we did our best to bring this issue that has been a

>> pain to the community laid to rest in a timely manner.

>>

>

> What do you mean as a pain to the community. This is about your believes

> and this is where you folk don't seem to understand. You can't sneak a

> proposal past last call just because you think or believe you are laying

> something to rest in a timely manner.

>

>

>> As said earlier, whichever way we go, some would object to it,

>>

>

> Valid, invalid and sustained objections are what policy development is all

> about. This is not about your subjectivity or belief that at the end of the

> day some will object.

>

> Of Course the working group will object as long as issues are not

> addressed and that is how the PDP works.

>

>

>> and we decided to deal with this once and for all

>>

>

> It's not your place as co-chairs to decide to deal with things once and

> for all. Consensus is a matter of both the entire PDWG if you somehow

> forgot.

>

>

>> in the best interest of the community with the least possible pain to the

>> community.

>>

>

> What is in the best interest of the community when you ignore and

> subjectively force a proposal forward in light of all objections and calls

> by a good number of working group members to take this flawed proposal back

> for discussions. You ignore the email from staff about reciprocity which

> you yourself jumped to ask Madvhi for help on the issue.

>

>

>> You elected us to serve the best interest of the community while leaving

>> behind emotional issues, and we would continue to do just as best as we

>> can.

>>

>

> Save me the rhetoric about "the best interest of the community" because

> you are doing very poorly if you asked me.

>

> Noah

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20201008/e5cd328b/attachment.html>