[rpd] Decisions ... Abuse contact

[Patrick Okui]

Dear Ekaterina, all,

In the same way simply stating that a concern is valid doesn’t 
automatically make it valid.

I’ve addressed issues about compliance, and enforcement so have 
others. Please respond to those emails and explain why it’s a valid 
matter.

As for GDPR, could you explain how this is valid? It is whois data just 
like admin-c and tech-c. Madhvi posted the link to the AFRINIC privacy 
policy which covers all this data plus explained the position of the 
organisation on GDPR compliance.

For someone to say it’s a valid concern they need to explain how that 
explanation is insufficient. And note that such an explanation is not 
specific to the abuse-c only but it affects all whois contact data.

On 30 Sep 2020, at 17:12 EAT, Ekaterina Kalugina wrote:


> There are still a number of matters that are unclear such as what 

> would happen to members who refuse to comply; issues with GDPR; the 

> definition of abuse; and the enforcement of this policy by AFRINIC. 

> These are all VALID concerns, and if you disagree - it is a matter of 

> your opinion and NOT their legitimacy. 



--
patrick