[rpd] AFPUB-2019-V4-003-DRAFT02 - Resource Transfer Policy

[Frank Habicht]

Hi,

On 28/09/2020 20:40, Gaby Giner wrote:

> Hi Noah,

> 

> The co-chairs have already put together a list of the objections for

> each proposal. Please refer to that. If you insist they're not valid,

> well it could be that your definition of what is valid is different from

> what the co-chairs observe as valid. For me, the objections presented

> are already valid. 


Not to me.
I have sent questions.
A week ago.
I re-sent today.

People asking for definitions of a thing that a policy is not needing to
define - that's not a valid objection to me.

People accusing the policy to force members to reply to abuse email is
not correct, because that's not what the policy does.

I have the very sad feeling that there are a lot of alternative facts
going around here.

Unless chairs respond to my questions I will consider most of the
objections listed by the chairs as irrelevant.

If you are right and the objections are valid, sure there will be
answers, right???

Thanks,
Frank