[rpd] Abuse Contact Policy

[Fernando Frediani]

+1

I want to call the Co-Chairs attention's to those opposing this proposal 
for reasons it is not intended to as written.
One thing is to have different views about many of the points discussed, 
another is to make incorrect statements about what the proposal is about.

Fernando

On 19/09/2020 08:47, Noah wrote:

>

>

> On Sat, 19 Sep 2020, 12:07 Frank Habicht, <geier at geier.ne.tz 

> <mailto:geier at geier.ne.tz>> wrote:

>

>     Hi,

>

>     I request the chairs to agree that supporters of the policy have shown

>     that a definition of "abuse" is not needed and continued calls for

>     that

>     are not relevant.

>

>

> +1 and as one of the strong supporters of this policy and a resources 

> member, I would like to categorically state that the definition of 

> abuse and the need for an abuse-contact in the context of internet 

> number resources and their usage is widely understood by folk who 

> operate real networks and its rather odd that some members of this 

> working group have wasted so much time debating this.

>

>

> FWIW, AFRINIC staff assessment clearly indicated that this policy 

> would contribute to the accuracy of the whois database to the benefit 

> of all resources members.

>

> Cheers,

> Noah

>

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200920/c3e51517/attachment-0001.html>