[rpd] coming together to a solution to the Inter-RIR problem

[ABDULKARIM OLOYEDE]

Hi Jordi,
Thanks for your suggestion. Events have overtaken some of your suggestions
but we would take onboard the others.
We appreciate your suggestions as we seek ways to improve our policy
development process.
Thanks

Co-Chair PDWG


On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 2:02 PM JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <
rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:


> Hi all,

>

> I just want to make sure that what I said in the open mic is clear and we

> can find a way forward.

>

> The importance of the IPv4 Inter-RIR problem is giant for the evolution of

> the region and the implementation of IPv6.

>

> As the staff confirmed, any Inter-RIR proposal will take 1 year to

> implement, the complexity is due to the need to coordinate with the systems

> of the other RIRs.

>

> I think it is also clear that we need to make sure that our policy is

> reciprocal with all the other RIRs if we really want to be useful.

>

> Considering that, and now that the chairs have declared that there is

> NO-consensus in any proposal, my suggestion for the way forwards is:

>

> 1) The staff should discuss with the other RIRs and confirm reciprocity

> with each of the proposals (deadline by mid-October)

> They key points are:

>         a) Will a "legacy only outgoing" be accepted as reciprocal?

>         b) Will a "Transferred IPv4 legacy resources will no longer be

> regarded as legacy resources" will be accepted as reciprocal?

>

> 2) The chairs to facilitate consensus among authors into a single version,

> as much as possible, with the different authors and to publish a new

> version following the discussion in the list and with the issues raised

> during this meeting (by end of October). This give us time to have one more

> version based in the list discussion.

>

> 3) Ask the board to call for a new online PDP by December as latest, if

> needed only for the Inter-RIR problem, so we can reach consensus at last.

>

> 4) Otherwise the board should make a policy (following the by-laws

> process), so the implementation *starts now* and time doesn't run against

> the community and bring it to the next policy meeting. Then if the

> community doesn't endorse the proposal, nothing happens, because it has not

> started to work (the implementation takes 1 year!) so we have time to

> cancel it or amend it.

>

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>


-- 
Website <http://www.unilorin.edu.ng>, Weekly Bulletin 
<http://www.unilorin.edu.ng/index.php/bulletin> UGPortal 
<http://uilugportal.unilorin.edu.ng/> PGPortal 
<https://uilpgportal.unilorin.edu.ng/>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200920/c5259a3a/attachment.html>