[rpd] Revised Proposal | Chairs Elections Process (Draft-2)

[Daniel Yakmut]

I am not convinced that we needed to completely change the process of
electing the Co-chairs

I rather prefer that we perfect who the voters should be, because
fundamentally that is where our problems lie. And if we want to add online
voting, to the in person that will be another expansion, considering
travelling will be limited  in the nearest future.

This proposal should go the direction of consolidation as against total
alteration.

Simply,
Daniel

On Sep 16, 2020 8:35 AM, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD" <rpd at afrinic.net>
wrote:


> Hi Cathie,

>

> Can you state what part of the text is what you disagree, I don't really

> understand your concerns.

>

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

> El 16/9/20 9:27, "Cathie Jay" <cathie.kay89 at gmail.com> escribió:

>

>     Dear all,

>

>     I oppose this policy because of its objective to drastically reduce

>     participation. The principle for equal representation will be violated

>     since the board would make decisions behind close doors. Any

>     information on the mechanisms of that vote are also missing,

>     especially on the system of electronic vote. The policy as it is

>     currently drafted calls for an intensive use of Afrinic’s resources

>     and this will, in the long-term lead to the loss of its efficiency.

>

>     All best wishes,

>

>     Cathie

>

>     On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 10:24 PM John Ngwoke <john.ngwoke at unn.edu.ng>

> wrote:

>     >

>     > The proposal is good, however, the word in the second paragraph,

> "The term ends during the first Public Policy Meeting corresponding to the

> end of the term for which they were appointed." for me, this could mean

> that the term ends during the meeting, that is while the meeting is still

> going on. which can be immediately the meeting starts or when the meeting

> has gone halfway or even at the tail point of the meeting.  So, it needs to

> be more clear.

>     > I think that this "A term may begin or end no sooner than the first

> day of the Public Policy Meeting and no later than the last day of the

> Public Policy Meeting as determined by the mutual agreement of the current

> Chair and the new Chair. " contradicts the earlier statement which clearly

> states when the term ends.

>     >

>     > I support this proposal if amended

>     >

>     >

>     > _______________________________________________

>     > RPD mailing list

>     > RPD at afrinic.net

>     > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>     _______________________________________________

>     RPD mailing list

>     RPD at afrinic.net

>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200916/7f8ea66d/attachment-0001.html>