[rpd] Policy Proposal: PDP Working Group (WG) Guidelines and Procedures

[Cathie Jay]

Bonsoir à tous,

Je m’oppose à cette proposition qui suggère qu'en cas de problèmes
rencontrés lors du vote à bulletin  secret, un modérateur temporaire
serait nommé par le comité de direction d’AFRINIC. Cette proposition
ne fait que rendre la tâche des co-modérateurs très complexe. Comme le
dit Marius, un système de vote par classement serait une solution à
envisager, pour rendre l’élection plus démocratique et équitable,
puisqu'elle permettrait à un grand nombre de candidats de se
présenter.

Bien à vous,

Cathie


On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:45 PM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com> wrote:

>

> Hello

> Your understanding is not quiet correct, because you are assuming all

> are legitimate voters and they should not be. The key thing is to accept

> a clear cut line.

> For example if the minimum time period to be registered in the RPD list

> for at least 6 months then anyone with 5 months and a couple of days

> will not be a legitimate voter and that is not a problem, even if the

> person has been contributing to the discussion for that past 5 months.

> If that person remains committed to the process he/she will become a

> voter for the next election.

>

> It's quiet normal to require someone a minimal commitment like this

> example above with a very objective requirement before allowing them to

> take part on decisions, otherwise the process becomes fragile at the

> point to bring unnecessary subjectivity.

>

> Fernando

>

> On 14/09/2020 10:25, Leo Vegoda wrote:

> > On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 7:47 PM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com> wrote:

> >> No problem at all.

> >> Let's define this them, as in other place by having people who really show commitment to the process and not just pass by once in a life time.

> > If you can come up with a clear definition that is rapidly accepted by

> > all then you are a genius.

> >

> >> Even if one or another may not be allowed to vote in a election (which is not a big problem) he/she will be on all other if continues committed to the process.

> > I'm not sure I actually understand what you are saying but I think you

> > are saying that excluding legitimate voters is acceptable. Is that

> > right?

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd