Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Policy Proposal: PDP Working Group (WG) Guidelines and Procedures

Fernando Frediani fhfrediani at gmail.com
Mon Sep 14 02:45:12 UTC 2020


No problem at all.
Let's define this them, as in other place by having people who really show
commitment to the process and not just pass by once in a life time.

Even if one or another may not be allowed to vote in a election (which is
not a big problem) he/she will be on all other if continues committed to
the process.


On Sun, 13 Sep 2020, 23:33 Leo Vegoda, <leo at vegoda.org> wrote:


> On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 6:21 PM Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>

> wrote:

>

> [...]

>

> > I also don't understand where this hard avoidance of election comes

> > from. What's wrong with it ? It is simple, prevents fraud and minimizes

> > disputes bringing more impartiality to the process.

>

> An election requires an electorate. That means some kind of

> qualification for participation and so a clear definition of who is

> excluded from participating. Coming up with a clear definition of who

> to exclude and why is never going to be easy. Coming up with a

> mechanism to implement the definition is not easy, either.

>

> Kind regards,

>

> Leo Vegoda

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200913/6885c0c5/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list