Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Policy Proposal: PDP Working Group (WG) Guidelines and Procedures

Fernando Frediani fhfrediani at gmail.com
Sun Aug 30 15:22:30 UTC 2020


I am not trying to impose anything. I am not even the author.
Instead please get used to deal with contrary arguments.

I already put several arguments against and why this is bad in any
situation regardless of the region. Please refute them or avoid any
other ad-hominen ones.

Thanks

On 30/08/2020 12:18, Arnaud AMELINA wrote:

> Ça c'est votre pont de vu. Pourquoi veux-tu imposer à la communauté

> ton point de vu. C'est pas parce que toi tu penses que c'est pas bon

> que ça doit s'imposer à tous. Si cela a été fait ailleurs et que ça

> fonctionne, que dois-je comprendre par ton obstination à dire que

> c'est mauvais ici ? Merci de clarifier. Et de considérer aussi le

> point de vu des autre. Tu n'as pas la science infuse. Ni ne detitns la

> totalité des savoirs.

>

> Cordialement

>

> Arnaud

>

> Le dim. 30 août 2020 à 14:34, Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com

> <mailto:fhfrediani at gmail.com>> a écrit :

>

> I did not say such thing about Africa, please don't make up stuff.

>

> I said very clearly elections by consensus are not good anywhere.

> Why make up stuff to support your argument ?

>

> It is exactly the opposite. "Election" by consensus leaves a great

> margin for subjectivity and for fraud while election by vote

> eliminates any subjectivity in the process if the process is

> auditable.

> This is how it's done in many other places and work as expected,

> without margin for disputes.

> Why have a type of "election" that can only serve for the propose

> of margin for fraud and more disputes than the current ones ?

>

> In my view the only fear of election by vote is from those who may

> not have them.

>

> Fernando

>

> On 30/08/2020 10:02, Arnaud AMELINA wrote:

>> La seule personne qui se répète c'est belle et bien toi Fernando.

>> Tu semble dire qu'en Afrique on est pas capable de gérer une

>> élection par consensus approximatif alors que d'autres régions le

>> font et que c'est utopique, c'est un rêve, etc., pour ton

>> information il existe bel et bien une forme d'élection qui

>> s'apparente à une élection par consensus approximatif merci de

>> suivre le lien suivant :

>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ranked_voting. Tu es le seul

>> à vouloir exiger d'aller vers une élection direct, quand on sait

>> tout ce que ça comporte moyen d'abus.

>>

>> Cordialement

>>

>> Arnaud

>>

>> Le sam. 29 août 2020 à 17:28, Fernando Frediani

>> <fhfrediani at gmail.com <mailto:fhfrediani at gmail.com>> a écrit :

>>

>> You must be joking with it or trying to make tricks and I am

>> having a serious discussion.

>>

>>

>> I already answered your question very clearly in the previous

>> message very clearly. If you wish to discuss it in a serious

>> way please go straight to the point.

>>

>>

>> Fernando

>>

>>

>> On 29/08/2020 14:21, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote:

>>> Hi Fernando,

>>>

>>> Let me not get involve at this stage in the discussions

>>> about which model of election is good or bad for the PDPWG.

>>>

>>> You have not answered my question. I am posting it again.

>>>

>>> I would like to find out whether you agree that the election

>>> by consent is used by working groups in RIPE region?

>>>

>>> Please do justice to it.

>>>

>>> Thanks

>>>

>>>

>>> Marcus

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>> *From:* Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>

>>> <mailto:fhfrediani at gmail.com>

>>> *Sent:* Saturday, August 29, 2020 2:29 PM

>>> *To:* rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>

>>> <rpd at afrinic.net> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>

>>> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Policy Proposal: PDP Working Group (WG)

>>> Guidelines and Procedures

>>>

>>> Seems the authors are actually repeating the same arguments

>>> and points.

>>> I am instead putting the many reasons election by consensus

>>> is not feasible, specially in this scenario we are going

>>> through currently.

>>>

>>> What doubt you have about this position regardless the RIR

>>> or region ? Perhaps you should read the messages again.

>>>

>>>

>>> Fernando

>>>

>>>

>>> On 29/08/2020 10:31, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote:

>>>> Hi Fernando,

>>>>

>>>> Thank you for your reaction but it appears you are not

>>>> discussing but repeating yourself with no value add.

>>>>

>>>> I would like to find out whether you agree that the

>>>> election by consent is used by working groups in RIPE region?

>>>>

>>>> Thanks

>>>>

>>>>

>>>>

>>>> Marcus

>>>>

>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

>>>> *From:* Fernando Frediani <fhfrediani at gmail.com>

>>>> <mailto:fhfrediani at gmail.com>

>>>> *Sent:* Friday, August 28, 2020 7:26 PM

>>>> *To:* rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>

>>>> <rpd at afrinic.net> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>

>>>> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Policy Proposal: PDP Working Group

>>>> (WG) Guidelines and Procedures

>>>> Hello

>>>>

>>>> If we are having all this trouble to define the next

>>>> elections probably

>>>> because there are multiple people interested in the next

>>>> elections, how

>>>> can we dream about any consensus ?

>>>>

>>>> Consensus is for proposals, for a collaborative improving

>>>> process that

>>>> may take months or even more than an year, not for electing

>>>> people.

>>>> What is the fear to have a proper vote process ? 1 person 1

>>>> vote and the

>>>> candidate with most votes wins and servers the term. What

>>>> can go wrong ?

>>>> When one is elected with most votes and there are no

>>>> signals of fraud

>>>> there is no room for disputes and discussions.

>>>>

>>>> Qualified people are people who effectively participate in the

>>>> construction of the process, who are truly part of it and have

>>>> commitment to it and not someone who is just passing in

>>>> front of the

>>>> door once in a lifetime.

>>>>

>>>> Afrinic PDP doesn't even have yet the possibility the Board

>>>> to appoint

>>>> interim Co-Chairs when necessary.

>>>>

>>>> Fernando

>>>>

>>>> On 28/08/2020 15:16, ALAIN AINA via RPD wrote:

>>>> > Hello,

>>>> >

>>>> > Below are our  responses to last comments received on

>>>> list on this proposal.

>>>> >

>>>> >

>>>> > ###### Comment 1

>>>> > Elections by consent is not for real world.

>>>> > #######

>>>> >

>>>> > It does work for working groups chairs selection in RIPE

>>>> region

>>>> >

>>>> > ##### Comment 2

>>>> > It's just something too utopic.

>>>> > #######

>>>> >

>>>> > As  utopic as  how “rough consensus” appear until you

>>>> experiment it and cherish

>>>> >

>>>> > ###### Comment3

>>>> > Election by vote where qualified people (with minimal

>>>> requirements) vote and the candidate with the highest votes

>>>> win, works in most places in the world with less margin 

>>>> for further disputes

>>>> > ######

>>>> >

>>>> > there are many models of elections with different ways of

>>>> qualifying voters, determining the winners, etc....

>>>> > What you described is just one the them. Not one fits all.

>>>> >

>>>> > Each  region adopts the best model for its PDP and how

>>>> chairs/lead for the PDP activities are selected.

>>>> >

>>>> https://www.apnic.net/community/participate/sigs/sig-guidelines/chair-elections/rir-comparison-table/

>>>> >

>>>> > One can see for example that in the case of LACNIC where,

>>>> there is an electronic votes by those subscribed to the

>>>> policy mailing list, the elections results “must” be

>>>> ratified by consensus among those present  at the PPM as

>>>> judged by the acting chairs. If results can’t be rectified,

>>>> board appoint an interim chair.

>>>> >

>>>> > The AFRINIC PDPWG adopted in the past  the model of 

>>>> votes by those physical present at the PPM, until it showed

>>>> its limit recently.

>>>> >

>>>> > Can you please elaborate on how the “qualified people”

>>>> should be selected in the context the PDPWG for the online

>>>> voting and how to prevent abuse and further disputes?

>>>> >

>>>> >

>>>> > HTH

>>>> >

>>>> > —Alain

>>>> >

>>>> >

>>>> > _______________________________________________

>>>> > RPD mailing list

>>>> > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>>>> > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>>>

>>>> _______________________________________________

>>>> RPD mailing list

>>>> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200830/ef68672f/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list