[rpd] Cloud Innovation Displays Very Poor, If Not Criminal, Netizenship

[Arnaud AMELINA]

C'est vraiment triste de constater à quel point certaines personnes sont
prêtes à dilapider les ressources d'Afrique en complicité avec des
commerçant sans scrupules. Et à venir sur cette liste défendre
l'indefendable.

Nous savons que ce Co-Conair est novice dans cette mission. C'est pour ça
qu'on le ménage un peu. Mais nous ne pouvons pas le laisser abuser des ses
prérogatives et jouer au dictateur sur cette liste communautaire. Il ne
semble pas maîtriser tous les contours de ses tâches liées à la mission que
la communauté be a confié. Nous l'invitons à bien lire les documents liés à
cette mission afin d'éviter les malentendus.

Pour ceux qui pensent que ce qui a été dénoncé ici est un acte mineur c'est
qu'ils n'ont rien compris des enjeux autour des ressources Numériques
d'AFRINIC. Nous les invitons à faire leur devoir de maison en allant lire
les documents et la mission principale d'AFRINIC ainsi que le CPM qui est
le fruit de tous les échanges et discussions issues de cette liste.

Que chacun de nous oeuvre pour la préservation des ressources africaines et
à bas les complices des dilapideurs de nos ressources.

Cordialement

Arnaud


Le mar. 9 juin 2020 à 08:11, Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> a
écrit :


> Good Morning All,

>

> Let me add my salt to the meat so that I can "eat from the meat when it is

> cooked". I can see a pattern of intimidation, the Co-Chairs issued a

> caution on the inconsistency of some members in posting matters that are

> unrelated to policy, however they continuously deviate from the caution,

> this left the Co-Chairs with no option but to act as they did and I don't

> see anything wrong with that.

>

> But from the barrage of attacks on the Co-Chairs for the action, I see an

> attempt to intimidate them because they have sanctioned some person(s) of

> the "Sons of the Soil of AfriNIC Community". This is unhealthy. The

> Co-Chairs were elected for moderation and they have to moderate. We could

> as well live without Chairs and see whether we will make any progress in

> developing any policies.

>

> There were suggestions clearly made earlier that the discussion on "Cloud

> Innovation Displays Very Poor, If Not Criminal, Netizenship"" was not for

> this forum, but some person(s) are persistent on having their way to

> discuss non-policy matter, this for me is a gross violation of the rules of

> engagement here. To insist they are correct or right in their action is a

> further push to "civil disturbances".

>

> The action of the Co-Chairs is right and justifiable and let us stop

> intimidating them, whenever they take action that is consistent with the

> rules of PDWG.

>

> Simply,

>

> Daniel

> On 07/06/2020 11:40 am, Anthony Ubah wrote:

>

>

> ****correction

> Hello Simon,

>

> You are right. I agree with the idea of consistency in moderation from the

> co-chairs, it is a must.

> But the accusations of 'pattern(s) of inconsistency' in this discussion

> have been vague. Personally, I do not spot an inconsistency in this

> instance.

>

>

> @All

>

> Since my previous post on this topic, I've been copied in responses which

> are neither directed to me nor relevant to me. I'll love to be untagged

> now. Thank you?

>

> Have a wonderful week ahead.

>

>

> Br,

>

> Anthony

>

> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 8:49 AM Simon Mayoye <mayoye at seacom.mu> wrote:

>

>> Hi Moriam/All,

>>

>> Agreed. But we also agree that this shall have consistency from the

>> Co-chairs, right?

>>

>>

>> Regards,

>>

>> Simon

>> ------------------------------

>> *From:* Moriam Omowunmi Sulaimon <sulaimonmoriam01 at gmail.com>

>> *Sent:* 07 June 2020 09:15 AM

>> *To:* Anthony Ubah

>> *Cc:* rpd at afrinic.net

>> *Subject:* Re: [rpd] Cloud Innovation Displays Very Poor, If Not

>> Criminal, Netizenship

>>

>> Dear Marcus and Murungi,

>>

>> Please this mailing list is for policy discussion and it should remain

>> for that alone. We fully support the Co-chair's decision.

>>

>> Cheers

>>

>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020, 12:40 AM Anthony Ubah <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com>

>> wrote:

>>

>>> Hello Marcus

>>>

>>> Every mailing list is set up for a purpose, and the rpd was set up to

>>> serve as the AFRINIC community’s Resource Policy Discussion List. All these

>>> lists are for one community, and there is a Code of Conduct that guides the

>>> community forums.

>>>

>>> If discussions on the list do not align with the purpose, should the

>>> Co-Chairs not be expected to moderate and regulate the community? Is it

>>> disruptive to do what one is expected to do?

>>>

>>>  You are right about one thing, “Many people feel frustrated and under

>>> attack....”, however, the following utterances by you are grossly unguided,

>>> and indicative of malice against the elected co-chair(s) and/or one or two

>>> members of the community. Thus the need for moderations.

>>>

>>> I think the co-chairs are doing an excellent job at curbing disarray

>>> within the community.

>>>

>>>

>>>

>>> Best Regards,

>>>

>>> Anthony

>>>

>>>

>>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2020 at 6:20 PM Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey at hotmail.com>

>>> wrote:

>>> >

>>> > Dear Abdulkarim,

>>> >

>>> > You were disruptive by trying to prevent the discussions to ever

>>> happen or happen on rpd.

>>> >

>>> > The bad actions and examples shall be allowed to be called out

>>> strongly.

>>> >

>>> > Community ignored your rant and kept discussions going without

>>> cochairs and made progress.

>>> >

>>> > The community does not elect cochairs to censor discussions while

>>> chosing which topics to be discussed on rpd list.

>>> >

>>> > While enforcing CoC is part of your role, it does not prescribe what I

>>> said above. In fact, you have so far not been able to provide an official

>>> reason for censorship of posts by Noah, a senior member of this community

>>> >

>>> > Community elected cochairs are expected to be neutral and mainly

>>> organize and moderate discussions around the PDP. This is one more question

>>> about your neutrality

>>> >

>>> > As we kept saying, a well organized and structured discussion style

>>> would  prevent many deviations and encourage more participation.

>>> >

>>> > Cultural and linguistic diversities plus different levels  of

>>> expertise, which all make the beauty of our community, have to be well

>>> exploited for the good.

>>> >

>>> > Many people feel frustrated and under attack with responses from

>>> others  because of the differences in the understandings.

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Marcus

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > ________________________________

>>> > From: ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE <oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng>

>>> > Sent: Friday, June 5, 2020 9:09 PM

>>> > To: Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey at hotmail.com>

>>> > Cc: Murungi Daniel <dmurungi at wia.co.tz>; Ubah Anthony Ikechukwu <

>>> ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com>; rpd at afrinic.net <rpd at afrinic.net>

>>> > Subject: Re: [rpd] [Community-Discuss] Cloud Innovation Displays Very

>>> Poor, If Not Criminal, Netizenship

>>> >

>>> > Dear Marcus,

>>> > Yes, I agree that the follow-up discussion was useful and am sure you

>>> would agree with us that it became useful when no one felt under attack.

>>> > Its that type of discussions that the code of conduct we all signed up

>>> to permits.  We were never disruptive maybe you meant constructive as we

>>> were only doing the job the community elected us to do.

>>> > Cheers

>>> > Co-Chair

>>> > Cheers and Have

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 4:28 PM Marcus K. G. Adomey <

>>> madomey at hotmail.com> wrote:

>>> >

>>> > I have not seen any response to this query and the followup

>>> discussions on the incident on rpd has proven to be useful for the mandate

>>> and scope of the PDP.

>>> >

>>> > You were just disruptive and you must stop this recurrent censorship

>>> as others have said.

>>> >

>>> > Please reinstate immediately Noah’s posting rights with apologies.

>>> >

>>> > Regards,

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Marcus

>>> >

>>> > ________________________________

>>> > From: Murungi Daniel <dmurungi at wia.co.tz>

>>> > Sent: Sunday, May 31, 2020 8:11 PM

>>> > To: ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE <oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng>

>>> > Cc: Ubah Anthony Ikechukwu <ubah.tonyiyke at gmail.com>; rpd at afrinic.net

>>> <rpd at afrinic.net>

>>> > Subject: Re: [rpd] [Community-Discuss] Cloud Innovation Displays Very

>>> Poor, If Not Criminal, Netizenship

>>> >

>>> > Dear Abdulkarim,

>>> >

>>> > Kindly elaborate on the details of the personal attack and chaos you

>>> mentioned in your last email.

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Regards,

>>> > Daniel

>>> >

>>> > On May 31, 2020, at 10:14 PM, ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE <

>>> oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote:

>>> >

>>> > Dear Murungi,

>>> > I have no issues with transparency, infact what I want is

>>> transparency. What we don't want is chaos. I don't think you would tolerate

>>> someone attacking you personally.

>>> > Thanks

>>> >

>>> > On Sun, 31 May 2020, 19:36 Murungi Daniel, <dmurungi at wia.co.tz> wrote:

>>> >

>>> > +1 @Mark Tinka.

>>> >

>>> > @Abdulkarim, it seems you have an issue with transparency on this

>>> list. Granted, some of Noah’s words may be heavy handed ( he is a

>>> passionate fellow) but I see no cause for the action you are proposing.

>>> >

>>> > Your ‘power’ as Co -PWGD is not to be wielded for stifling member

>>> voices or punishing what you perceive to be a personal slight.

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Regards,

>>> > Daniel

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > > On May 31, 2020, at 10:29 AM, Mark Tinka <mark.tinka at seacom.mu>

>>> wrote:

>>> > >

>>> > >

>>> > >

>>> > > On 30/May/20 08:11, ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE wrote:

>>> > >

>>> > >> Dear Noah,

>>> > >> Your last  email has clearly violated the last warning earlier

>>> issued

>>> > >> by the Co-Chair. Therefore we are left with no choice than to

>>> moderate

>>> > >> any email you send onto this mailing list. This would be reviewed

>>> > >> after a week.

>>> > >

>>> > > I would have to say that this is a very slippery slope we are

>>> treading down.

>>> > >

>>> > > Mark.

>>> > >

>>> > > _______________________________________________

>>> > > RPD mailing list

>>> > > RPD at afrinic.net

>>> > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Website, Weekly Bulletin UGPortal PGPortal

>>> >

>>> >

>>> >

>>> > Website, Weekly Bulletin UGPortal PGPortal

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> RPD mailing list

>>> RPD at afrinic.net

>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>>>

>>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing listRPD at afrinic.nethttps://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200609/ee87f3ae/attachment-0001.html>