[rpd] [Community-Discuss] Cloud Innovation Displays Very Poor, If Not Criminal, Netizenship

[Owen DeLong]

IPv4 only continues to have value as long as eyeballs and content are not available on IPv6.

So… The statement that spending our energy migrating to IPv6 will devalue IPv4 is 100% accurate.

Owen



> On May 30, 2020, at 16:27 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz> wrote:

> 

> 

> 

> On Mon, 25 May 2020, 23:14 Nishal Goburdhan, <nishal at controlfreak.co.za <mailto:nishal at controlfreak.co.za>> wrote:

> On 25 May 2020, at 3:28, Arnaud AMELINA wrote:

> 

> 

> [snip rhetoric]

> 

> 

> > There is something here for the community to learn about.

> 

> yes!  spend your energy on migrating to ipv6.

> help devalue, and make irrelevant, the ipv4 market.

> 

> Not easy to devalue a scarce resource which most fortune CSP out of San Francisco continue the rush to acquire from transfer markets.

> 

> I am not sure if their intentions is to stockpile IPv4 and render it useless (joking) or they are motivated by the economic benefits presented by the services they offer globally that heavily rely on IPv4 numbering thereby presenting significant value to IPv4 even though IPv6 does the same.

> 

> 

> anything else is not a sustainable way forward.

> 

> I different school of thought believes that both protocols will continue to co-exist (transition  arguments debunked) until such time when there is significant IPv6 traffic from eyeballs some more years ahead (20 more years so many factors).

> 

> Cheers,

> Noah

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200530/7a4cbfaa/attachment.html>