[rpd] PDP issues because the lack of the confirmation of dates for the new PPM

[Noah]

On Fri, 8 May 2020, 11:13 ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE, <
oloyede.aa at unilorin.edu.ng> wrote:


>

As far as we Co-chairs are concerned the ruling of the appeal

> committe means that our decision was upheld,

>


Am not sure there was a ruling if the appeal committee indicated that the
said appeal didnt meet the apparent requirements of three WG supporters
even though there is WG support for the proposal itself archived.

Even the so called support is subject to interpretations and clarification
has been sought from the appeals committee as to what they mean after all
their previous appeals  ruling years ago didnt spell out the 3 supporters
requirement which was the basis of the recent dramatic ruling by AC.



meaning the policy proposal goes back to the discussion stage.

>


Not so fast.

IMHO, I am still waiting for clarification from the appeals committee in
relationship to their contradictions of how they handled the previous
appeals vs this particular case. [1]

Noah

[1] If appeals committee doesnt clarify their ruling then the issue needs
to be escalated beyond the PDWG and appeals committee itself since the
working group is not satisfied with the co-chairs and appeals committees
decisions.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200508/85d67432/attachment.html>