Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] [SPAM?] Re: Larus Foundation and Afrinic PDP

Daniel Yakmut yakmutd at googlemail.com
Wed Feb 19 13:16:25 UTC 2020


Hi Badru,


We can only heal, when some people don't claim entitlement over AfriNIC. 
I don't think as African, I will be seen to be less African or less 
Patriotic, such notions breed rebellion.

I will differ slightly with some of your opinions, we need independent 
sponsors. In that regard as a community we can create a Fellowship 
"regulations" for any organization to follow and provide support outside 
the AfriNIC structure.


cheers

Daniel



On 19/02/202Hi Badru0 5:25 am, Badru Ntege wrote:
> So members
>
> In the court of public opinion and the absence of a moderator on this 
> particular issue, but based on many emails over the last few days. 
>  Looks like the analogy of “walks like a duck quacks like a duck must 
> be a 🦆“ seems to have some substance here.
>
> So i would suggest we ask any foundation planning to assist the 
> community to go through Afrinic as suggested by Jordi
>
> In the absence of that we can explore the motives of that organization 
> especially where through the discussions it has been insinuated that 
> the same organization or a related party might be using allocated 
> resources in a manner that contradicts the rules of allocation and 
> thus could be using funds to subvert policy through mass recruitment 
> and paying for open mic and policy discussion time
>
> I think we have to be practical arround this issue and resolve it in a 
> mature way.
>
> Lets fix what is wrong and not blindly debate the issue.  Its very 
> clear something is not right.
>
> Communities heal and grow or divide and die.  Lets heal.
>
> Regards
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On 19 Feb 2020, at 07:09, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD 
>> <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:
>>
>> 
>>
>> Hi Blaise,
>>
>> Don’t think that only in Africa many people don’t know about AFRINIC, 
>> the meetings, the PDP, etc.
>>
>> This is a common in all the RIRs. Many ISPs only see the relevant RIR 
>> as the “provider” of the IP addresses, not as an organization that is 
>> the community itself, and it is up to the community to setup the 
>> rules (PDP -> policies).
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jordi
>>
>> @jordipalet
>>
>> El 19/2/20 2:53, "Blaise Fyama" <bfyama at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:bfyama at gmail.com>> escribió:
>>
>> This discussion is a true replica of a bald bal ... after the fourth 
>> day we see who is really who!
>> Beyond LARUS I would like us to also be told the conditions for the 
>> selection of African-African organizations. Are all African 
>> geopolitics taken into account, does popularization conform to 
>> standards? Or concerns only a privileged few connected to the 
>> "system"? Personally I am amazed that the overwhelming part of the 
>> African community does not know everything about AFRINIC I can give 
>> testimony of my own region where I am. An impartial and 
>> multi-criteria analysis on ALL fellowships systems for AFRINIC 
>> meetings would be more beneficial for the entire community. An Asian 
>> organization which offers scholarships to young Africans by its 
>> methods against African-African organizations which also offer 
>> scholarships according to their methods.
>>
>> Anyway between Africans we know each other well!
>>
>> Blaise.
>>
>> Blaise FYAMA
>>
>> Msc, PhD.
>>
>> Professeur Associé
>>
>> Secrétaire Général Académique Honoraire/UL
>>
>> Doyen de la Faculté des Sciences Informatiques/UPL
>>
>> Doyen a.i de la Faculté Polytechnique/UPL
>>
>> Chef de Département Génie Electrique/ESI-UNILU
>>
>> Chef de Service Informatique/Polytech-UNILU
>>
>> Consultant Informatique BIT/PAEJK
>>
>> Tel: +243995579515
>>
>> Numéro O.N.I.CIV: 00460
>>
>> MSc, PhD.
>>
>> Associate Professor
>>
>> Honorary Academic Secretary General / UL
>>
>> Dean of the Faculty of Computer Science / UPL
>>
>> Dean a.i of the Polytechnic Faculty / UPL
>>
>> Head of Department of Electrical Engineering / ESI-UNILU
>>
>> IT Service Manager / Polytech-UNILU
>>
>> IT Consultant BIT / PAEJK
>>
>> Phone: +243995579515
>>
>> O.N.I.CIV number: 00460
>>
>> Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 16:11, Kakel Mbumb <kakelmbumb at gmail.com 
>> <mailto:kakelmbumb at gmail.com>> a écrit :
>>
>>     The general understanding I have is that more african youths and
>>     part of its population need to contribute on the use of internet
>>     and the way it changes people's lives. Different organizations
>>     are therefore welcomed to provide support or training whenever
>>     possible to bring awareness on the issue about internet use and
>>     regulations. And everyone is entitled to have its own internal
>>     management unless it goes against the general approbation as per
>>     Law.
>>
>>     From my experience, I have a lot of Youths in my country who are
>>     in the IT sector but don't even know what is AFRINIC and how it
>>     contributes to the improvement of internet in Africa.
>>
>>     Sponsors are therefore contributing to make them aware of that
>>     and have the chance to take part to Policy meetings. People are
>>     not handcuffed to be obliged to have a certain stsnd and they are
>>     free to choose whether to abide by the rules or not.
>>
>>     My thought. !!
>>
>>     Le lun. 17 févr. 2020 à 22:41, <rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>     <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>> a écrit :
>>
>>         Send RPD mailing list submissions to
>>         rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>>
>>         To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>         or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         rpd-request at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>
>>
>>         You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         rpd-owner at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net>
>>
>>         When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>>         specific
>>         than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>>
>>
>>         Today's Topics:
>>
>>            1. Re: Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP (Noah)
>>            2. Re: Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP (Owen DeLong)
>>            3. Re: RPD Digest, Vol 161, Issue 31 (Owen DeLong)
>>
>>
>>         ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>         Message: 1
>>         Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 22:49:48 +0300
>>         From: Noah <noah at neo.co.tz <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>>
>>         To: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>>
>>         Cc: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <rpd at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
>>         Subject: Re: [rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP
>>         Message-ID:
>>                
>>         <CAEqgTWbKeOPnk5L2qyKR8DGQmxxrUs+4Cf21tVcwRvTTTgqTXw at mail.gmail.com
>>         <mailto:CAEqgTWbKeOPnk5L2qyKR8DGQmxxrUs%2B4Cf21tVcwRvTTTgqTXw at mail.gmail.com>>
>>         Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>>         On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, 02:18 Owen DeLong, <owen at delong.com
>>         <mailto:owen at delong.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > On Feb 14, 2020, at 22:35 , Badru Ntege
>>         <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>>
>>         > wrote:
>>         >
>>         > Am i reading that participants will be rewarded due to the
>>         amount of time
>>         > they public spend at the mic ??
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > No. Amount of time is only relevant in attendance at the
>>         sessions.
>>         > However, we also don?t want to see purely passive sitting
>>         through sessions,
>>         > but actual active engagement in them.
>>         >
>>         > Just asking what might outrightly be seen as a silly
>>         question but looks
>>         > like ?open mic minutes for sell?
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > I realize you and some others wish to take the most cynical
>>         possible view.
>>         > Please note that I said the comments must be relevant.
>>         >
>>         > We are attempting to encourage legitimate active participation.
>>         >
>>         > As much as we appreciate the above the line opticals of
>>         helping the
>>         > community we must always be cognizant of the bellow the
>>         line motives.
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > While I cannot speak for everyone involved in this process,
>>         I can assure
>>         > you that I have no below-the-line motivation. My motivation
>>         in this process
>>         > is to
>>         > encourage additional active participation. It is my belief
>>         that the best
>>         > policies will evolve from the most engaged community.
>>         >
>>         > Pls note I?m reading from the response. And not insinuating
>>         any motives
>>         > but as they say If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck,
>>         and quacks like
>>         > a duck, then it probably is a duck.
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > Please just say what you mean.
>>         >
>>         > Owen
>>         >
>>
>>         Owen,
>>
>>         Your continous support to these controversies amuses me a lot.
>>
>>         You are rewarding people for time spent at the mic to create
>>         an engaged
>>         community for a better PDP?
>>
>>         As you know, all the current active policies were discussed
>>         and ratified by
>>         this community over the past 20 years and Larus Foundation
>>         was never there
>>         when various proposals were drafted and deliberated, past
>>         volunteers
>>         co-chaired the PPM and managed working groups on this list
>>         and over the
>>         years through rough consensus, they got all the active
>>         policies today
>>         ratified.
>>
>>         I am disgusted by this continued undermining of AfriNIC.
>>         -------------- next part --------------
>>         An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>         URL:
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200217/e0d27883/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>>         ------------------------------
>>
>>         Message: 2
>>         Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:03:23 -0800
>>         From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>>
>>         To: Noah <noah at neo.co.tz <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>>
>>         Cc: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <rpd at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
>>         Subject: Re: [rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP
>>         Message-ID: <3C05FC07-7B60-4D2E-8A81-2F476C51F42D at delong.com
>>         <mailto:3C05FC07-7B60-4D2E-8A81-2F476C51F42D at delong.com>>
>>         Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>>
>>
>>         > On Feb 17, 2020, at 11:49 , Noah <noah at neo.co.tz
>>         <mailto:noah at neo.co.tz>> wrote:
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020, 02:18 Owen DeLong, <owen at delong.com
>>         <mailto:owen at delong.com> <mailto:owen at delong.com
>>         <mailto:owen at delong.com>>> wrote:
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >> On Feb 14, 2020, at 22:35 , Badru Ntege
>>         <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>>> wrote:
>>         >>
>>         >> Am i reading that participants will be rewarded due to the
>>         amount of time they public spend at the mic ??
>>         >
>>         > No. Amount of time is only relevant in attendance at the
>>         sessions. However, we also don?t want to see purely passive
>>         sitting through sessions, but actual active engagement in them.
>>         >
>>         >> Just asking what might outrightly be seen as a silly
>>         question but looks like ?open mic minutes for sell?
>>         >
>>         > I realize you and some others wish to take the most cynical
>>         possible view. Please note that I said the comments must be
>>         relevant.
>>         >
>>         > We are attempting to encourage legitimate active participation.
>>         >
>>         >> As much as we appreciate the above the line opticals of
>>         helping the community we must always be cognizant of the
>>         bellow the line motives.
>>         >
>>         > While I cannot speak for everyone involved in this process,
>>         I can assure you that I have no below-the-line motivation. My
>>         motivation in this process is to
>>         > encourage additional active participation. It is my belief
>>         that the best policies will evolve from the most engaged
>>         community.
>>         >
>>         >> Pls note I?m reading from the response.  And not
>>         insinuating any motives but as they say If it looks like a
>>         duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it
>>         probably is a duck.
>>         >
>>         > Please just say what you mean.
>>         >
>>         > Owen
>>         >
>>         > Owen,
>>         >
>>         > Your continous support to these controversies amuses me a lot.
>>         >
>>         > You are rewarding people for time spent at the mic to
>>         create an engaged community for a better PDP?
>>         >
>>         > As you know, all the current active policies were discussed
>>         and ratified by this community over the past 20 years and
>>         Larus Foundation was never there when various proposals were
>>         drafted and deliberated, past volunteers co-chaired the PPM
>>         and managed working groups on this list and over the years
>>         through rough consensus, they got all the active policies
>>         today ratified.
>>         >
>>         > I am disgusted by this continued undermining of AfriNIC.
>>
>>         I am confused as to how bringing new blood into the process
>>         is ?undermining?.
>>
>>         New blood and new ideas are life for any organization or
>>         process which intends to continue for more than a very short
>>         period of time.
>>
>>         The board we have today is not the board we had when AfriNIC
>>         began. Is having a new board undermining the process?
>>         The CEO we have today is not the CEO we had when AfriNIC
>>         began. Is having a new CEO undermining the process?
>>         Many of the most vocal participants in the process today were
>>         not participants in the process when AfriNIC began. Are you
>>         saying that any voice which was not here at the beginning is
>>         ?undermining the process??
>>
>>         It is not the goal or intent of Larus foundation to undermine
>>         anything. We are, exactly as Daniel said, providing
>>         opportunities for more Africans to participate in the AfriNIC
>>         process.
>>
>>         Owen
>>
>>         -------------- next part --------------
>>         An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>         URL:
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200217/c43b57e2/attachment-0001.html>
>>
>>         ------------------------------
>>
>>         Message: 3
>>         Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 13:40:25 -0800
>>         From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>>
>>         To: Maloto Nyirenda <Maloto.Nyirenda at MTL.mw>
>>         Cc: "rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>"
>>         <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>,
>>         "rpd-request at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>"
>>                 <rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>>
>>         Subject: Re: [rpd] RPD Digest, Vol 161, Issue 31
>>         Message-ID: <8A75D201-832F-4CC8-A178-DF6FC165ADCF at delong.com
>>         <mailto:8A75D201-832F-4CC8-A178-DF6FC165ADCF at delong.com>>
>>         Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>
>>         That?s good feedback. I?ll look into making sure we try to
>>         document our selection criteria.
>>
>>         I will say that we do try to select individuals that we
>>         believe are likely to be valuable contributors to the
>>         community, primarily ICT students or those early in their ICT
>>         careers. We do not call for participants that are not likely
>>         to engage.
>>
>>         Owen
>>
>>
>>         > On Feb 16, 2020, at 23:14 , Maloto Nyirenda
>>         <Maloto.Nyirenda at MTL.mw> wrote:
>>         >
>>         > I think it is highly significant  that such fellows 
>>         selected  are  able to contribute in such meetings through
>>         active contributions, however the  terms of their selections
>>         are well outlined, otherwise there is no  logic  calling
>>         participants  that are not likely to engage in such  fellowships
>>         >
>>         > regards
>>         > Maloto
>>         > From: rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>> <rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>>>
>>         > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2020 12:21 AM
>>         > To: rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
>>         <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>>
>>         > Subject: RPD Digest, Vol 161, Issue 31
>>         >
>>         > Send RPD mailing list submissions to
>>         > rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>
>>         >
>>         > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>>         > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>         > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>>         > rpd-request at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-request at afrinic.net>>
>>         >
>>         > You can reach the person managing the list at
>>         > rpd-owner at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd-owner at afrinic.net>>
>>         >
>>         > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
>>         specific
>>         > than "Re: Contents of RPD digest..."
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > Today's Topics:
>>         >
>>         >    1. Re: Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP (Daniel Yakmut)
>>         >    2. Re: Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP (Owen DeLong)
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         >
>>         > Message: 1
>>         > Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 13:11:21 +0100
>>         > From: Daniel Yakmut <yakmutd at googlemail.com
>>         <mailto:yakmutd at googlemail.com>
>>         <mailto:yakmutd at googlemail.com <mailto:yakmutd at googlemail.com>>>
>>         > To: "Marcus K. G. Adomey" <madomey at hotmail.com
>>         <mailto:madomey at hotmail.com> <mailto:madomey at hotmail.com
>>         <mailto:madomey at hotmail.com>>>, Arnaud AMELINA
>>         >         <amelnaud at gmail.com <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com>>>,
>>         AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
>>         >         <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>>
>>         > Subject: Re: [rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP
>>         > Message-ID: <06938d8a-fa65-ab60-bdd6-d70312115497 at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:06938d8a-fa65-ab60-bdd6-d70312115497 at gmail.com>
>>         <mailto:06938d8a-fa65-ab60-bdd6-d70312115497 at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:06938d8a-fa65-ab60-bdd6-d70312115497 at gmail.com>>>
>>         > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252";
>>         Format="flowed"
>>         >
>>         > I suspect when we ask questions, and the questions are
>>         coming from a non
>>         > bias perception, then I believe you will have received several
>>         > responses. However, I will attempt to say that Larus
>>         Foundation's major
>>         > objective can be surmised as "Providing opportunity,
>>         increasing access
>>         > and exposing young Africans to the AfriNIC processes"
>>         >
>>         > - How they choose their Fellows is at there discretion.
>>         >
>>         > - How they evaluate the Fellows is also their business,
>>         however they may
>>         > wish, to one day give us the result of their impact
>>         analysis. At that
>>         > point we can appreciate Larus Foundation for giving young
>>         Africans an
>>         > opportunity to contribute to the growth of the Internet
>>         Community in Africa.
>>         >
>>         > - I strongly support that Larus Foundation provides their
>>         Fellows with
>>         > some stipend either as a blanket support or tied to some
>>         form of
>>         > performance indicators, this should not be a subject of
>>         interest to
>>         > anyone, since the person is not providing the funds.
>>         >
>>         > - Lastly, I have seen Larus Foundation becoming more open
>>         with their
>>         > processes in the last two meetings, which gives any African
>>         the
>>         > opportunity to apply for the fellow and possibly be
>>         selected to attend.
>>         >
>>         > Just my attempt to respond and remove the bizarre silence.
>>         >
>>         > Simply,
>>         >
>>         > Daniel
>>         >
>>         > On 14/02/2020 9:50 pm, Marcus K. G. Adomey wrote:
>>         > > Dear Community,
>>         > >
>>         > > It looks bizarre that the questions asked here got no
>>         responses so
>>         > > far. I do hope the Larus Foundation will provide them
>>         soon to
>>         > > enlighten this community.
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > > Marcus
>>         > >
>>         > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/blhgte
>>         <https://aka.ms/blhgte>>
>>         > >
>>         ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>         > > *From:* Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com> <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com>>>
>>         > > *Sent:* Sunday, January 12, 2020 12:21:14 PM
>>         > > *To:* rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy <rpd at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>>
>>         > > *Subject:* [rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP
>>         > > Dear community,
>>         > >
>>         > > You may remember the? recent discussions about Larus?
>>         Foundation
>>         > > fellowship in respect to? educational documents provided
>>         to fellows as
>>         > > meeting background material(*) and which? intended to
>>         condition their
>>         > > views on proposals and their contributions at the PPM and
>>         after..
>>         > >
>>         > > https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009734.html
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009734.html>
>>         > >
>>         > > I came across the actual agreement? which defines the
>>         terms and
>>         > > conditions under which? the fellowship program work.
>>         > >
>>         > > The agreement signed by each fellow stipulated the
>>         followings:
>>         > >
>>         > > Page 1
>>         > > Larus Foundation? obligations to offer the fellowship
>>         program and
>>         > > payments are subject to terms and conditions and? *fellow
>>         performance*
>>         > >
>>         > > Page 2
>>         > > Fellow is expected to meaningfully participate in the
>>         meeting, not
>>         > > just sit in the meeting room. This can include voicing
>>         opinions,
>>         > > responding to comments, participate in Hallway
>>         conversations.....
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > > Page 5
>>         > > Upon fellow completion of the fellowship program at
>>         Larus? foundation
>>         > > satisfaction... Larus will offer stipends... the final
>>         decision for
>>         > > the disbursement of the stipends is subject to Larus?s
>>         sole discretion...
>>         > >
>>         > > Value of the stipend: There are two parts that form the
>>         total value of
>>         > > the stipend as the followings:
>>         > > First part(advanced payment): in the form of airfare,
>>         hotel, other
>>         > > transportation costs for the meeting paid up front? by Larus.
>>         > >
>>         > > The second part: the remainder will be paid after the
>>         meeting... the
>>         > > value is in the range of 0 to 500$. Stipend payment is
>>         contingent to
>>         > > fellow attendance and participation and conformance to
>>         the fellowship
>>         > > terms and conditions? herein....
>>         > >
>>         > > Larus judgment on fellow participation will be final and
>>         binding to
>>         > > the parties
>>         > >
>>         > > At Larus sole discretion, in the event that fellow fails
>>         to actively
>>         > > participate in fellowship program and in the meeting or
>>         violate this
>>         > > terms and conditions, the stipend will not be offered.?
>>         In addition,
>>         > > Larus is entitled to seek indemnify for all costs pay up
>>         front? by
>>         > > Larus and any cost associated to the collection of such
>>         compensation,
>>         > > including but not limited to court? costs, collection
>>         costs and attorney.
>>         > > =====
>>         > >
>>         > > The following questions come to mind:
>>         > >
>>         > > 1-? From the educational material given to fellows which
>>         is purely
>>         > > based? on Larus views on each proposals, positions to
>>         defend, what are
>>         > > the objectives set for each policy meeting and how are
>>         the objectives
>>         > > aligned with the general community interest?
>>         > >
>>         > > 2- Would Larus assume under these terms and conditions
>>         that opinions
>>         > > expressed? by fellows during policy meetings are Larus
>>         opinions? and
>>         > > do not represent fellow individual opinions?
>>         > >
>>         > > 3- how is fellow performance measured as it is at Larus sole
>>         > > discretion? What are the metrics and values used to
>>         determine the
>>         > > performance level?
>>         > >
>>         > > 4-how is the reward (0 to 500$) applied? based on the
>>         fellow performance?
>>         > >
>>         > > Regards
>>         > > __
>>         > >
>>         > > _______________________________________________
>>         > > RPD mailing list
>>         > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>>         > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>         > -------------- next part --------------
>>         > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>         > URL:
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200216/60541982/attachment-0001.html
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200216/60541982/attachment-0001.html>>
>>         >
>>         > ------------------------------
>>         >
>>         > Message: 2
>>         > Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2020 14:21:22 -0800
>>         > From: Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>
>>         <mailto:owen at delong.com <mailto:owen at delong.com>>>
>>         > To: Badru Ntege <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>>>
>>         > Cc: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
>>         <rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>>
>>         > Subject: Re: [rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP
>>         > Message-ID:
>>         <D39C0414-932C-457D-9102-91D0253233AB at delong.com
>>         <mailto:D39C0414-932C-457D-9102-91D0253233AB at delong.com>
>>         <mailto:D39C0414-932C-457D-9102-91D0253233AB at delong.com
>>         <mailto:D39C0414-932C-457D-9102-91D0253233AB at delong.com>>>
>>         > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>>         >
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > > On Feb 14, 2020, at 22:35 , Badru Ntege
>>         <badru.ntege at nftconsult.com
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com
>>         <mailto:badru.ntege at nftconsult.com>>> wrote:
>>         > >
>>         > > Am i reading that participants will be rewarded due to
>>         the amount of time they public spend at the mic ??
>>         >
>>         > No. Amount of time is only relevant in attendance at the
>>         sessions. However, we also don?t want to see purely passive
>>         sitting through sessions, but actual active engagement in them.
>>         >
>>         > > Just asking what might outrightly be seen as a silly
>>         question but looks like ?open mic minutes for sell?
>>         >
>>         > I realize you and some others wish to take the most cynical
>>         possible view. Please note that I said the comments must be
>>         relevant.
>>         >
>>         > We are attempting to encourage legitimate active participation.
>>         >
>>         > > As much as we appreciate the above the line opticals of
>>         helping the community we must always be cognizant of the
>>         bellow the line motives.
>>         >
>>         > While I cannot speak for everyone involved in this process,
>>         I can assure you that I have no below-the-line motivation. My
>>         motivation in this process is to
>>         > encourage additional active participation. It is my belief
>>         that the best policies will evolve from the most engaged
>>         community.
>>         >
>>         > > Pls note I?m reading from the response.  And not
>>         insinuating any motives but as they say If it looks like a
>>         duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it
>>         probably is a duck.
>>         >
>>         > Please just say what you mean.
>>         >
>>         > Owen
>>         >
>>         > >
>>         > > ......just saying
>>         > >
>>         > > BN
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > > Badru Ntege
>>         > > Group CEO
>>         > > NFTCONSULT
>>         > > +256 772712088
>>         > > Twt: ntegeb
>>         > >
>>         > > From: Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey at hotmail.com
>>         <mailto:madomey at hotmail.com> <mailto:madomey at hotmail.com
>>         <mailto:madomey at hotmail.com>>>
>>         > > Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2020 3:00 AM
>>         > > To: Arnaud AMELINA; AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
>>         > > Subject: Re: [rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP
>>         > >
>>         > > Dear Community,
>>         > >
>>         > > It looks bizarre that the questions asked here got no
>>         responses so far. I do hope the Larus Foundation will provide
>>         them soon to enlighten this community.
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > > Marcus
>>         > >
>>         > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/blhgte
>>         <https://aka.ms/blhgte>>
>>         > > From: Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com> <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com
>>         <mailto:amelnaud at gmail.com>>>
>>         > > Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 12:21:14 PM
>>         > > To: rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy <rpd at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net> <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net
>>         <mailto:rpd at afrinic.net>>>
>>         > > Subject: [rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP
>>         > >
>>         > > Dear community,
>>         > >
>>         > > You may remember the  recent discussions about Larus 
>>         Foundation fellowship in respect to  educational documents
>>         provided to fellows as meeting background material(*) and
>>         which  intended to condition their views on proposals and
>>         their contributions at the PPM and after..
>>         > >
>>         > > https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009734.html
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009734.html>
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009734.html
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009734.html>>
>>         > >
>>         > > I came across the actual agreement which defines the
>>         terms and conditions under which  the fellowship program work.
>>         > >
>>         > > The agreement signed by each fellow stipulated the
>>         followings:
>>         > >
>>         > > Page 1
>>         > > Larus Foundation  obligations to offer the fellowship
>>         program and payments are subject to terms and conditions and 
>>         *fellow performance*
>>         > >
>>         > > Page 2
>>         > > Fellow is expected to meaningfully participate in the
>>         meeting, not just sit in the meeting room. This can include
>>         voicing opinions, responding to comments, participate in
>>         Hallway conversations.....
>>         > >
>>         > >
>>         > > Page 5
>>         > > Upon fellow completion of the fellowship program at
>>         Larus  foundation satisfaction... Larus will offer
>>         stipends... the final decision for the disbursement of the
>>         stipends is subject to Larus?s sole discretion...
>>         > >
>>         > > Value of the stipend: There are two parts that form the
>>         total value of the stipend as the followings:
>>         > > First part(advanced payment): in the form of airfare,
>>         hotel, other transportation costs for the meeting paid up
>>         front  by Larus.
>>         > >
>>         > > The second part: the remainder will be paid after the
>>         meeting... the value is in the range of 0 to 500$. Stipend
>>         payment is contingent to fellow attendance and participation
>>         and conformance to the fellowship terms and conditions 
>>         herein....
>>         > >
>>         > > Larus judgment on fellow participation will be final and
>>         binding to the parties
>>         > >
>>         > > At Larus sole discretion, in the event that fellow fails
>>         to actively participate in fellowship program and in the
>>         meeting or violate this terms and conditions, the stipend
>>         will not be offered.  In addition, Larus is entitled to seek
>>         indemnify for all costs pay up front  by Larus and any cost
>>         associated to the collection of such compensation, including
>>         but not limited to court  costs, collection costs and attorney.
>>         > > =====
>>         > >
>>         > > The following questions come to mind:
>>         > >
>>         > > 1-  From the educational material given to fellows which
>>         is purely based  on Larus views on each proposals, positions
>>         to defend, what are the objectives set  for each policy
>>         meeting and how are the objectives aligned with the general
>>         community interest?
>>         > >
>>         > > 2- Would Larus assume under these terms and conditions
>>         that opinions expressed  by fellows during policy meetings
>>         are Larus opinions  and do not represent fellow individual
>>         opinions?
>>         > >
>>         > > 3- how is fellow performance measured as it is at Larus
>>         sole discretion? What are the metrics and values used to
>>         determine the performance level?
>>         > >
>>         > > 4-how is the reward (0 to 500$) applied  based on the
>>         fellow performance?
>>         > >
>>         > > Regards
>>         > > __
>>         > > _______________________________________________
>>         > > RPD mailing list
>>         > > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>>         > > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>         >
>>         > -------------- next part --------------
>>         > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>         > URL:
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200216/9d7107f4/attachment.html
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200216/9d7107f4/attachment.html>>
>>         >
>>         > ------------------------------
>>         >
>>         > Subject: Digest Footer
>>         >
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > RPD mailing list
>>         > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>>         > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>         >
>>         >
>>         > ------------------------------
>>         >
>>         > End of RPD Digest, Vol 161, Issue 31
>>         > ************************************
>>         > _______________________________________________
>>         > RPD mailing list
>>         > RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>         <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>>
>>         > https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd>
>>         -------------- next part --------------
>>         An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>>         URL:
>>         <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200217/2e0270fa/attachment.html>
>>
>>         ------------------------------
>>
>>         Subject: Digest Footer
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         RPD mailing list
>>         RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>>         ------------------------------
>>
>>         End of RPD Digest, Vol 161, Issue 33
>>         ************************************
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     RPD mailing list
>>     RPD at afrinic.net <mailto:RPD at afrinic.net>
>>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>> _______________________________________________ RPD mailing list 
>> RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>>
>>
>> **********************************************
>> IPv4 is over
>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>> The IPv6 Company
>>
>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged 
>> or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive 
>> use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty 
>> authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents 
>> of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is 
>> strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you 
>> are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, 
>> distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if 
>> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be 
>> considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original 
>> sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200219/a75722fe/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list