[rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP

[Armel KEUPONDJO]

I think it will be very difficult to assess the performance of the fellows.
And again, it will be necessary to clearly define the objectives to be
assigned to the fellows.
and they need to know the criteria

Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 16:57, Eva Nadege N'Cho <evayedidja at gmail.com> a
écrit :


> Salut à tous,

>

> Après lecture des termes et conditions du programme de bourse Larus, je

> reste perplexe quant à l’impartialité de certains critères notamment ceux

> mentionnés à la « Page 5 ».

>

>

>

> Je ne voudrais pas m’étaler sur ce point mais je pense que le fait d’avoir

> d’autres programmes de bourses pour participer aux réunions de l’AFRINIC

> est louable mais si cela crée des suspicions dans la communauté alors je

> trouve que la proposition de @Jordi est judicieuse.

>

>

>

> Les bourses offertes par AFRINIC , LARUS ou toute autre organisme sont

> pour la communauté alors je ne vois pas le mal à créer un cadre de

> concertation sur les clauses des programmes de bourses.

>

> Je crois qu’au final c’est toujours la communauté qui en sortira gagnante.

>

>

>

> Merci

>

>

>

> Eva Yedidja

>

>

>

> *De : *Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com>

> *Envoyé le :*dimanche 12 janvier 2020 12:25

> *À : *rpd >> AfriNIC Resource Policy <rpd at afrinic.net>

> *Objet :*[rpd] Larus foundation and Afrinic PDP

>

>

>

> Dear community,

>

>

>

> You may remember the  recent discussions about Larus  Foundation

> fellowship in respect to  educational documents provided to fellows as

> meeting background material(*) and which  intended to condition their views

> on proposals and their contributions at the PPM and after..

>

>

>

>  https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009734.html

>

>

>

> I came across the actual agreement  which defines the terms and conditions

> under which  the fellowship program work.

>

>

>

> The agreement signed by each fellow stipulated the followings:

>

>

>

> Page 1

>

> Larus Foundation  obligations to offer the fellowship program and payments

> are subject to terms and conditions and  *fellow performance*

>

>

>

> Page 2

>

> Fellow is expected to meaningfully participate in the meeting, not just

> sit in the meeting room. This can include voicing opinions, responding to

> comments, participate in Hallway conversations.....

>

>

>

>

>

> Page 5

>

> Upon fellow completion of the fellowship program at Larus  foundation

> satisfaction... Larus will offer stipends... the final decision for the

> disbursement of the stipends is subject to Larus’s sole discretion...

>

>

>

> Value of the stipend: There are two parts that form the total value of the

> stipend as the followings:

>

> First part(advanced payment): in the form of airfare, hotel, other

> transportation costs for the meeting paid up front  by Larus.

>

>

>

> The second part: the remainder will be paid after the meeting... the value

> is in the range of 0 to 500$. Stipend payment is contingent to fellow

> attendance and participation and conformance to the fellowship terms and

> conditions  herein....

>

>

>

> Larus judgment on fellow participation will be final and binding to the

> parties

>

>

>

> At Larus sole discretion, in the event that fellow fails to actively

> participate in fellowship program and in the meeting or violate this terms

> and conditions, the stipend will not be offered.  In addition, Larus is

> entitled to seek indemnify for all costs pay up front  by Larus and any

> cost associated to the collection of such compensation, including but not

> limited to court  costs, collection costs and attorney.

>

> =====

>

>

>

> The following questions come to mind:

>

>

>

> 1-  From the educational material given to fellows which is purely based

> on Larus views on each proposals, positions to defend, what are the

> objectives set  for each policy meeting and how are the objectives aligned

> with the general community interest?

>

>

>

> 2- Would Larus assume under these terms and conditions that opinions

> expressed  by fellows during policy meetings are Larus opinions  and do not

> represent fellow individual opinions?

>

>

>

> 3- how is fellow performance measured as it is at Larus sole discretion?

> What are the metrics and values used to determine the performance level?

>

>

>

> 4-how is the reward (0 to 500$) applied  based on the fellow performance?

>

>

>

> Regards

>

> __

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>



-- 

*------------------------------------------------------------------------------*

*Armel KEUPONDJO *

*Docteur Ingénieur en Informatique
                                            *
*Consultant-Formateur*


*Tel: 225 58 24 47 69*
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200218/89c6616f/attachment.html>