[rpd] Afrinic Scandals, future and the PDP

[Noah]

Hey Owen


On Fri, 7 Feb 2020, 05:20 Owen DeLong, <owen at delong.com> wrote:


>

>

> On Feb 6, 2020, at 06:00 , gregoire.ehoumi via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>

> wrote:

>

> Hi Nishal,

>

> I am glad to finally see some conversations on these topics and thanks for

> your contributions.

>

> The RPD is indeed the appropriate forum to discuss these issues as it is

> directly related to the management, distribution and usage of the INRs.

>

> Your reaction to the cochairs unbelievable decision on the AS0 ROAs

> proposal did not go unnoticed and I see you mentioning AS0 ROA as one of

> the solution to the problem being discussed here, as relates to continued

> routing of *hijacked prefixes* as bogons.

>

> How could one understand the Co-Chairs decision about the AS0 ROA in this

> context without giving the impression that the rot has set in and that

> there seems to exist some cover-up game going on?

>

>

> While I don’t entirely agree with the Co-Chairs determination on this

> item, I will say that there was some appearance of controversy within the

> community over the proposal and I think their conclusion is arguably

> legitimate.

>


Could you spell out the said controversy. I have gone through the archives
and I have watched the PPM videos and dont see nothing.




> The co-chairs aren’t there to pass value judgment on the merits of the

> proposal. They are there to guide and moderate the discussion, help the

> community explore the issues, help the authors develop well written

> implementable policy, and ultimately to decide whether the community has

> come to consensus in favor of the proposed policy.

>


The co-chairs would do the working group some service if they came out to
specifically clarify their controversial conclusion on this proposal.

Noah
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20200207/a5ba5780/attachment.html>