Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] End of LAST call

Nishal Goburdhan nishal at controlfreak.co.za
Sat Feb 1 09:28:25 UTC 2020


On 01 Feb 2020, at 10:42, Paschal Ochang <pascosoft at gmail.com> wrote:

>

> I think its usually impossible to track all objections raised. It might be too much of a workload for the cochairs to track objections and map them to answers to come out with a conclusion. However, just as people here have said they can request for help. Furthermore, I think the authors can also assist in doing that during their responses to objections cos it will be easier to document that way to show a documented addressing of objections to prove that all has been addressed.



considering that the co-chairs MUST evaluate objections to gauge if there is consensus or not, which, means that they MUST obviously read and decide if these are substantive objections, or not, i don’t see why the co-chairs - working with afrinic’s policy development officer - can not produce a report highlighting these contentious issues.

i do not think that the co-chairs should be asked to map these to solutions; that is not their role.

i would be sceptical of any author producing a report, claiming to address all objections.

—n.







More information about the RPD mailing list