[rpd] End of LAST call

[Owen DeLong]

I agree with Nishal, Jordi, and Frank.

All of the “objections” I saw seemed to indicate a clear lack of understanding of RPKI in general and the proposal in specific.

All of them raised concerns that simply don’t fit the facts of what is being proposed.

I did not see any legitimate or critical objections. If there is something I missed, please enumerate it (them) for the edification of the list.

Owen



> On Jan 29, 2020, at 03:58 , Nishal Goburdhan <nishal at controlfreak.co.za> wrote:

> 

> On 29 Jan 2020, at 12:35, ABDULKARIM AYOPO OLOYEDE wrote:

> 

>> Dear PDWG,

>> The following policy proposals have been on the Last call for about 4 weeks

>> 1.  Multihoming not required for ASN

>> 2.  Adjusting IPv6 PA Policy

>> 3. RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address Space

>> 

>> However, we received some critical objections that should be addressed on

>> the policy named  "RPKI ROAs for Unallocated and Unassigned AFRINIC Address

>> Space" therefore we believe it requires more discussion.

> 

> could you enumerate those “critical objections” please.  that would help the authors to fix this for round two.

> from my perspective, the last series of responses, came from a fundamental misunderstanding of what RPKI is, and how it works.

> 

> (bear in mind, that it’s not the authors’ - or this list’s - responsibility to explain RPKI ..)

> 

> -n.

> 

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd