[rpd] Decisions on policy proposals discussed during themeeting

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ]

You're right, and same result. Not updated, no time in the agenda.

Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
 
 

El 23/12/19 0:04, "Sander Steffann" <sander at steffann.nl> escribió:

    iH,
    
    > If authors want to play trick with a new version, but not addressing community inputs … it is perfectly reasonable and I will say part of the chairs job, not allocate time for a proposal that has been updated only with editorial changes.
    
    No, because then a proposal will still not expire. The chairs should not accept an update that doesn't address (which doesn't mean accommodate) the raised issues, period.
    
    Cheers,
    Sander
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.