[rpd] Decisions on policy proposals discussed during themeeting

[Sander Steffann]

iH,


> If authors want to play trick with a new version, but not addressing community inputs … it is perfectly reasonable and I will say part of the chairs job, not allocate time for a proposal that has been updated only with editorial changes.


No, because then a proposal will still not expire. The chairs should not accept an update that doesn't address (which doesn't mean accommodate) the raised issues, period.

Cheers,
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20191223/3d37e1b2/attachment.sig>