[rpd] new version of "Multihoming not required for ASN" (AFPUB-2019-ASN-DRAFT04)

[Fernando Frediani]

Hello Jordi

The change you made on 7.2.2 from "Single interconnection, with a 
provider that requires a public" to "Show a unique routing policy or 
demonstrate a technical need for a coordinated globally unique" means 
different things in my view and may make things slightly more difficult 
for organizations to receive an ASN.

When it says "show a unique routing policy" doesn't necessarily mean two 
Transit providers  (it could be an IX, a private peering to another ASN, 
etc), but excludes the possibility to have an ASN with a single Transit 
Upstream. On the second part that says "demonstrate a technical need for 
a coordinated globally unique ASN" what kind of technical need could for 
example be acceptable to justify to have an ASN with a single Transit 
Upstream provider (have their own assigned IP space ?) ?
My concern is not to exclude de possibility for organizations to have an 
ASN even if they have a single interconnection with their Transit Upstream.

Could you clarify this please ?

Thanks
Fernando Frediani

On 25/11/2019 08:45, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:

> Hi all,

>

> Find attached a new version of the proposal "Multihoming not required for ASN", following the latest inputs in the list.

>

> I've also prepared an online diff of the changes to the proposed policy text, so it is easy to track:

>

> https://www.diffchecker.com/omm6xj7m

>

>

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

>   

>   

>

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20191125/6d872185/attachment.html>