<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hello Jordi</p>
<p>The change you made on 7.2.2 from "<span class="jsx-406281813
diff-chunk diff-chunk-removed">Single interconnection, with a
provider that requires a public" to "</span><span
class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-removed"><span
class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-inserted">Show a
unique routing policy or demonstrate a technical need for a
coordinated globally unique" means different things in my view
and may make things slightly more difficult for organizations
to receive an ASN.</span></span></p>
<p><span class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-removed"><span
class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-inserted">When it
says "show a unique routing policy" doesn't necessarily mean
two Transit providers (it could be an IX, a private peering
to another ASN, etc), but excludes the possibility to have an
ASN with a single Transit Upstream. On the second part that
says "demonstrate a technical need for a coordinated globally
unique ASN" what kind of technical need could for example be
acceptable to justify to have an ASN with a single Transit
Upstream provider (have their own assigned IP space ?) ?<br>
My concern is not to exclude de possibility for organizations
to have an ASN even if they have a single interconnection with
their Transit Upstream.</span></span></p>
<p><span class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-removed"><span
class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-inserted">Could you
clarify this please ?</span></span></p>
<p><span class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-removed"><span
class="jsx-406281813 diff-chunk diff-chunk-inserted">Thanks<br>
Fernando Frediani<br>
</span></span></p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 25/11/2019 08:45, JORDI PALET
MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:1D0D8752-0172-4574-B192-CEA80F5B6955@consulintel.es">
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">Hi all,
Find attached a new version of the proposal "Multihoming not required for ASN", following the latest inputs in the list.
I've also prepared an online diff of the changes to the proposed policy text, so it is easy to track:
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://www.diffchecker.com/omm6xj7m">https://www.diffchecker.com/omm6xj7m</a>
Regards,
Jordi
@jordipalet
**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.theipv6company.com">http://www.theipv6company.com</a>
The IPv6 Company
This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
</pre>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<pre class="moz-quote-pre" wrap="">_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:RPD@afrinic.net">RPD@afrinic.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>