Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] inputs on IPv4 Inter-RIR policy proposals

Owen DeLong owen at delong.com
Mon Jul 15 17:13:30 UTC 2019





> On Jul 15, 2019, at 01:00, Mark Elkins <mje at posix.co.za> wrote:

>

> I'm not sure I'd agree with this. A single year in Internet terms is like 5 years in other businesses and a lot can change. Rather change the restriction to something like, if you do an IPv4 transfer - you have to wait a year before requesting more IPv4.

>


I actually think I’m ok with a prohibition in future free pool requests. If you sold address space, then I think it’s reasonable that you need to buy it if you need more in the future. In other words, you can’t get free pool space for flipping repeatedly, but you can still get more space via transfer if your business needs change.


> *NEW* You are then restricted from ever transferring those new IPv4 addresses.

> (which will probably be small, /20's or smaller).

>

> *OR* simply state that IPv4 addresses from the last block can never be transferred?


I think these are good and reasonable safeguards with or without the above limitation (preferably with).



>

> I personally think reality will catch up and there won't be any more addresses to obtain from the Registry but I don't have a crystal ball.


This depends on whether or not the community eventually adopts policies to further exacerbate the current shortage in favor of extending the duration of the free pool. (E.g. SL-BIS).

Owen

>

>> On 2019/07/15 06:21, John Hay wrote:

>> Hi Jordi,

>>

>> On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 00:05, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD

>> <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

>>> Hi John,

>>>

>>> Let's make sure I understood your point:

>>> "One clause that I would be quite happy with is something like "Once

>>> you have sold IPv4 address space, you are not eligible to get any from

>>> Afrinic again", instead of the 12 month period."

>>>

>>> We have this right now for intra-RIR:

>>>

>>> 5.7.3.2 Source entities will not be eligible to receive any further IPv4 address allocations or assignments from AFRINIC for a period of 12 months after a transfer approval.

>>>

>>> 5.7.3.3 Source entities must not have received a transfer, allocation, or assignment of IPv4 number resources from AFRINIC for the 12 months prior to the approval of transfer request. This restriction excludes mergers and acquisitions transfers.

>>>

>>> -> If I got you correctly, you mean:

>>> 5.7.3.2 Source entities will not be any more eligible to receive any further IPv4 address allocations or assignments from AFRINIC.

>>>

>>> Is that your point? I think I will agree with that, as it is a good protection to avoid anyone getting addresses holding them for 12 months, and then selling those and asking for more (which or course at some point will not be possible one AFRINIC run out).

>>>

>> Yes that is my point. If you are willing to sell IPv4 address space,

>> you in effect say that you have enough for your own use, so you should

>> not need to request again.

>>

>> Regards

>>

>> John

>>

>>> Let's make sure and check what other participants believe.

>>>

>>> Regards,

>>> Jordi

>>> @jordipalet

>>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> RPD mailing list

>> RPD at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

> --

> Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa

> mje at posix.co.za Tel: +27.128070590 Cell: +27.826010496

> For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: https://ftth.posix.co.za

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd





More information about the RPD mailing list