[rpd] inputs on IPv4 Inter-RIR policy proposals

[SOUAD ABIDI]

Lee,
AfriNIC can't cancel the contract suddenly, afriNIC decides if the Lessor
can renew the contract with the lessee or not  (depends on what's left in
the pool and members' demand), it means that the lessee knew already when
the contract is over (the contract is up to 5 years), so it's an inventive
way to the ipv6 deployment.

Reagrds.
Souad

Le dim. 14 juil. 2019 à 10:43, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>
a écrit :


> Hi Ish,

>

> In all the RIRs there is such board prerogative to halt any policy.

>

> If I recall correctly, it just happened in ARIN a few months ago regarding

> a waiting list. I don't recall any other case, and this is actually not

> something needed in the policy text (is already in the bylaws), but I want

> to bring it just to make sure the community feels "safer".

>

> The other point that you mention, is not covered already with the same

> point that I'm proposing to add:

> 4.       The staff can provisionally suspend any suspicious operation that

> creates a big unbalance against AFRINIC, until the board takes a decision.

>

> So, we don't need to wait for the board decision, the staff will able to

> suspend any suspicious operation. Then the board decides if this suspension

> is maintained for that operation, or something different should be done

> (even halting the policy).

>

> Regards,

> Jordi

> @jordipalet

>

>

>

> El 14/7/19 9:09, "Ish Sookun" <ish.sookun at lasentinelle.mu> escribió:

>

>     Hi Lee,

>

>     On 7/13/19 11:53 PM, Lee Howard wrote:

>     > While I think this is a good idea, I think the idea that the Board

> could

>     > halt the inter-RIR transfer if it's too imbalanced makes more sense.

>     >

>

>     The Board intervention sounds more "feasible" than having a complex

>     three-party contract where the risk for the lessee is higher.

>

>     However, the idea I tossed earlier in this thread was to introduce a

>     mechanism that could prevent the moving out of IPv4 addresses en masse,

>     rather than having to rely on Board's intervention. Having a cap on the

>     amount of resources per transfer and limiting the period of transfer

>     could help.

>

>     Do we have any precedent of the Board's intervention in such a case?

>

>     Regards,

>

>     Ish Sookun

>

>     _______________________________________________

>     RPD mailing list

>     RPD at afrinic.net

>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

>

>

>

> **********************************************

> IPv4 is over

> Are you ready for the new Internet ?

> http://www.theipv6company.com

> The IPv6 Company

>

> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or

> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of

> the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized

> disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this

> information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly

> prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the

> intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or

> use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including

> attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal

> offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this

> communication and delete it.

>

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> RPD mailing list

> RPD at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190714/255b4466/attachment.html>