[rpd] Assisted Registry Checks

[Sylvain BAYA]

Hi all,

Please see below (inline)...

Le 6/26/2019 à 9:36 AM, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD a écrit :
>
> I just got one idea … One possibility to make it more neutral and
> having the knowledge of the operational insights …
>

 Hi Jordi, if i'm getting you well, (permit me please) you are saying
that it if we need a policy proposal turned as an operational procedure,
we should leave the exclisivity up to the Staff to submit it to the PDWG
prior to be implemented... Am i wrong ?

> Even if normally the staff doesn’t submit policy proposals, is
> perfectly valid. Nothing is against that in the PDP. They follow
> exactly the same process: the community must also approve it.
>
 
 IMHO, i see no real need (yes :-) the neutrality you mentioned above)
to *Varying the process* here. I mean someone, from the PDWG, should
just submit it (if needed), then it will follow the normal PDP (Impact
Analysis Report will raise the Staff concern then).

My point is that, we want the Staff more proactive [1], to *timely*
provide needed information (including legal one) both onlist and at PPM
(CPM section 3.4.0), to *timely* provide Impact Analysis Reports (CPM
section 3.4.1)...and as actually proven, it's not easy to get it done.

> This way it was developed in RIPE NCC.
>
>  
>
> Maybe Ernest, Madhvi or other staff want to take it?
>

...i don't think that they should be involved in the PDP as author, even
just in case of emergency :-)
Is there not also a bit of *conflict of interest* ?
 
>
> Again, they could do this just an operational procedure, but if we
> prefer a policy, this is nice way in the middle.
>

Ok with that, and again i see no problem if any other participant (or an
other special WG which may exist ?) decides to author|submit such an
operational policy proposal :-) 
__
[1]: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2019/009626.html>

Shalom,
--sb.
 
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
> Jordi
>
> @jordipalet
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> El 26/6/19 10:29, "Nasir Faruk" <nasirfaruk at gmail.com
> <mailto:nasirfaruk at gmail.com>> escribió:
>
>  
>
> @SOUAD ABIDI,
>
>  
>
> I think the author sent ARC document as a suggestion or rather
> something worth looking at that could assists to shape the discussion
> on INR. I am sure it's presented as a new proposal.
>
>  
>
> @Dewole, i hope i'm right?
>
>  
>
> Best Regards
>
>  
>
> Faruk.
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ..........................................................................................................
> [...]

-- 

Regards,
Sylvain B.
<http://www.chretiennement.org> 
__
Website : <https://www.cmnog.cm>
Wiki : <https://www.cmnog.cm/dokuwiki>
Surveys : <https://survey.cmnog.cm>
Subscribe to Mailing List : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/mailman/listinfo/cmnog/>
Mailing List's Archives : <https://lists.cmnog.cm/pipermail/cmnog/>
Last Event's Feed : <https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOGlab3>
<https://twitter.com/cmN0G>
<https://facebook.com/cmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/REBOOTcmNOG>
<https://twitter.com/hashtag/cmNOG>
<https://cmnog.wordpress.com/>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/7941e7a5/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0x0387408365AC8594.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 4826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/7941e7a5/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190626/7941e7a5/attachment-0001.sig>