[rpd] Proposal update received: AFRINIC Policy Development Process Bis

[Fatma ELKORY OUMRANE]

Salut Jordi,

Désolée pour le retard de ma réaction. Mais bien que vous ayez raison,
une section indique que la RSA devrait être soumise à la politique
adoptée tout le temps, mais cela ne signifie pas que la clause en
conflit direct dans laquelle j'ai signalé devient invalide.
L’obligation pour les membres de signer un contrat qui contredit
directement la politique constitue une violation du PCI-2.

Afrinic peut-il légalement préciser comment la clause susmentionnée
n'est pas contredite par une "politique de transfert"?

Le personnel d’Afrinic peut-il répondre aux questions suivantes:

1. Si un membre réutilise ses ressources IP, ce membre doit-il
renvoyer l'IP à AFRINIC, car elle enfreint la clause 4 de la RSA; c)
.i lequel ces services ont été demandés.

2. Si un membre n'a plus besoin de la ressource IP, ce membre doit-il
renvoyer l'adresse IP à AFRINIC car elle enfreint la clause RSA 4. (c)
.iv
(1) informateur AFRINIC, chaque fois que les changements interviennent
au point où ils ne sont plus nécessaires, ils ont besoin de ressources
ou de ressources.
(2) renvoyer à AFRINIC, dans un délai de 15 jours suivant la
signification de ce que vous aimeriez au (iv) (1) de prestation de
services;

Étant donné que le seul moyen d'obtenir une offre pour le transfert
est soit 1. le membre n'a plus besoin d'espace, mais il est disposé à
vendre, soit le membre 2. utilise à nouveau l'espace et a laissé des
espaces disponibles à la vente. La "politique de transfert interne" ne
peut pas être mise en œuvre si les deux conditions susmentionnées sont
vraies.

Je vous remercie.

Cordialement.


Fatma






2019-06-11 9:44 UTC+01:00, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net>:
> Now my inputs on this new version.
>
> I still have most of the concerns that I've previously expressed, so not
> repeating myself.
>
> Furthermore, now the 2-weeks decision period for the chairs has been
> removed, which I think is a big problem. I radically oppose to that.
>
> One more issue, that I didn't noticed before. I don't see the reason for
> having "a guidelines"
> (https://afrinic.net/policy/policy-development-working-group-guidelines-and-procedures-v2)
> document in a different "page". If we adopt this, everything should be in a
> single document, because everything is part of the PDP.
>
> Further, I will suggest that aspects such as election process and AUP are
> taken apart from this discussion, otherwise it gets quite complex. I've
> disagreements with the actual text, but considering that it should be taken
> apart, I object to it.
>
> Regards,
> Jordi
> @jordipalet
>
>
>
> El 11/6/19 9:24, "JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD" <rpd at afrinic.net> escribió:
>
>     Hi Dewole, all,
>
>     As with other proposals, I've done an on-line diff:
>
>     https://www.diffchecker.com/bsBv30lZ
>
>     Regards,
>     Jordi
>     @jordipalet
>
>
>
>     El 11/6/19 7:28, "Dewole Ajao" <dewole at forum.org.ng> escribió:
>
>         Dear PDWG members,
>
>         This is to inform you that authors of the policy proposal named
> "Abuse
>         Contact Policy Update" have submitted an updated version (Draft
> version
>         5). The proposal is published at
>         https://afrinic.net/policy/proposals/2017-gen-002-d5#proposal
>
>         Do take note also of the proposed working group guidelines and
>         procedures document at
>
> https://afrinic.net/policy/policy-development-working-group-guidelines-and-procedures-v2
>
>         Please take some time to go through the proposal contents and
> provide
>         your feedback.
>
>         Thank you.
>         PDWG Co-Chairs
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         RPD mailing list
>         RPD at afrinic.net
>         https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
>
>     **********************************************
>     IPv4 is over
>     Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>     http://www.theipv6company.com
>     The IPv6 Company
>
>     This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be
> aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
> this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     RPD mailing list
>     RPD at afrinic.net
>     https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>
>
>
>
> **********************************************
> IPv4 is over
> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
> http://www.theipv6company.com
> The IPv6 Company
>
> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or
> confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the
> individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure,
> copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if
> partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be
> considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be
> aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of
> this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly
> prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the
> original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>