Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Nomcom feedback to PDWG

Owen DeLong owen at
Sat Jun 8 14:23:33 UTC 2019


I wish to thank the nominating committee for their responsiveness to the community. However, I think it is important that you not only let us know that you considered our feedback, but that you inform the community of your conclusions and decisions based on that feedback. 

Were candidates added to the slate as a result of these deliberations?

If so, all of them? Unless all of them, then some explanation of what made the difference for the ones not added is also in order. It doesn’t have to be candidate specific, but at least a general statement such as “those not added still had not submitted responses at the time of our deliberations” or “some candidates submitted insufficient responses” or “some candidates were found not to meet the requirements spelled out in the bylaws or the pdp”. 

I don’t ask you to violate anyone’s privacy, but I do hope you will communicate enough with the community to preserve the trust that is bestowed on your committee by the community. 



> On Jun 8, 2019, at 03:21, Iyedi Goma <iyedigoma at> wrote:
> Dear community,
> The Nomination Committee would like to thank the PDWG for its feedback.
> The Nomination Committee held a meeting on 7 June.  It discussed the period given for the PDWG nominees to submit their documentation.  The Nomination Committee considered the basic principles of the PDP.
> The Nomination Committee reviewed the nomination of the persons who submitted their documentation.  The Nomination Committee Chair contacted each nominee to notify him/her of the decision.
> Serge-Parfait Goma
> Afrinic 2019 Nomcom Chair
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list