Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Nomcom feedback to PDWG

Paschal Ochang pascosoft at
Sat Jun 8 12:14:04 UTC 2019

We do accept that the candidates can be contacted by noncom based on
confidentiality to resolve the issues. However, I think a public
announcement on the perceived outcome of the decisions is necessary. Right
now all you are trying to do is to raise a bunch of speculations from the
community. For example I am busy thinking the following: has noncom agreed
to include the candidates? Are the candidates being quizzed for more info?
Have  noncom erred and are trying to cover up?.
Like I said before a simple explanation of the lapses will reduce the
purported insinuations.

On Saturday, June 8, 2019, Daniel Yakmut via RPD <rpd at> wrote:

> Why do NonCom speaks in parables.
> On Jun 8, 2019, at 11:21 AM, Iyedi Goma <iyedigoma at> wrote:
> Dear community,
> The Nomination Committee would like to thank the PDWG for its feedback.
> The Nomination Committee held a meeting on 7 June.  It discussed the
> period given for the PDWG nominees to submit their documentation.  The
> Nomination Committee considered the basic principles of the PDP.
> So what are the considerations?
> The Nomination Committee reviewed the nomination of the persons who
> submitted their documentation.  The Nomination Committee Chair contacted
> each nominee to notify him/her of the decision.
> There was a public compliant regarding this matter. Can we also have a
> public information on the decision of NomCom on the matter?
> Simply,
> Daniel
> Serge-Parfait Goma
> Afrinic 2019 Nomcom Chair
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list