Search RPD Archives
[rpd] RPD : Prolicy proposal "Internet Number Resources review by AFRINIC" informations update
benjamin.eshun at gmail.com
Sat Apr 27 08:38:43 UTC 2019
On Mon, Apr 22, 2019 at 4:05 AM Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
> Let’s recognize that the policy is unnecessary and the RSA is currently sufficient as it is.
At least we agree partial here that the current RSA is currently
sufficient as it is. Because stated in Section 6 (d) (i) (d)
“Acknowledges: (i) that this agreement shall at all times be subjected
to adopted policies;” .
There are no polices to guide staff on how to investigate (review)
the applicant’s utilisation of the number resources already assigned.
Hence I fail to see how this policy is unnecessary.
> The truth that this policy is unnecessary, duplicative, and potentially harmful?
I have proved that this policy is very necessary and rather seeks to
provide a framework in which staff can use to ensure transparency,
objectivity and fairness in the review of assigned resources.
> The truth that the community has repeatedly rejected this policy and it is unlikely to come to consensus?
> The truth that the authors changes to between the previous version and the current version are minimal and fail to address the majority of objections?
> The truth that many of the objections to this proposed policy have existed almost as long as the policy and still remain unaddressed by the authors?
I fail to see the objection that was raised and not addressed by the
authors, except the objections that this policy is costly and time
consuming for staff, if not, unnecessary, duplicative and harmful
The proposal has a long life and I see efforts of the authors to
address real objections. What I have not seen is propositions to
improve and make things harmless.
More information about the RPD