Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] New Policy Proposal Received - "Multihoming not required for ASN (AFPUB-2019-ASN-DRAFT01)"

S. Moonesamy sm+af at
Fri Apr 5 21:22:40 UTC 2019

Hi Jordi,
At 12:18 PM 05-04-2019, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>The impact analysis in AfriNIC is not "requested" but done 
>automatically, since, 1 year ago or so, at least. I suggested it 
>some time ago I think as well for all the policies.

It is usually better to ask for something instead of waiting for it 
to be happen automatically.

>I recall I was told that this one will be published today or so, 
>because I've already a new version prepared with the changes that we 
>have been discussing in the list, but I want to take the opportunity 
>to verify that nothing else is discovered as "broken" by the impact analysis.

One of the principles of the existing policy development process is 
transparency.  One of the reasons for that principle is so that 
anyone in this working group can assess the impact of a proposed 
policy.  There is an assumption that the person(s) proposing a policy 
change would be able to analyze its potential impact or request 
information, if it is not already available, to do that.

There is a network operator who provided feedback on the two words 
which I mentioned previously.  Could you please provide some feedback 
on the last question in my previous email?

S. Moonesamy 

More information about the RPD mailing list