[rpd] SL update policy, and its implication for a transition pool.

[APH]

Dear all

That's good ideas, We must see text of the policy made by the authors.


Best regard,


Le 2018-12-03 à 00:40, Nishal Goburdhan a écrit :

> hi,
>
> i have a question for the authors of the “SL update policy”.  i’ve 
> been told before that there isn’t a “transition only” pool set aside 
> specifically, because this is supposed to be one of those things that 
> was magically dealt with, “out of the /12”.  with your update the 
> option to do this disappears.  and i don’t see another place for this  
> (although it’s quite possible that i’m missing something)
>
> is this intentional?
>
> fwiw, i support the _intent_ of the policy;  however, i do not think 
> that this (the lack of a transition pool) was raised as a concern, if 
> the update to SL was adopted as proposed.  i would have expected this, 
> from the staff analysis.  (i am sure there might be more concerns too, 
> if folks sat down and though about them…)
>
> to be clear, i’m not asking for this to be included in your policy.  
> just that a more thorough analysis be done.
>
> —n.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
-- 


*Pascal* Heriliva ANDRIANISA
Webmaster i RENALA
*R*esearch and *E*ducation *N*etwork for *A*cademic and *L*earning 
*A*ctivities - http://www.irenala.edu.mg/
Porte 201 - Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche 
Scientifique - Fiadanana
GSM :+261 (0) 32 46 680 29   |    +261 (0) 34 30 680 29

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190218/2b81ef1a/attachment.html>